ResearchSpace

Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Herselman, Martha E
dc.contributor.author Botha, Adèle
dc.contributor.author Fogwill, Thomas
dc.contributor.author Alberts, Ronell
dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-17T09:13:27Z
dc.date.available 2017-05-17T09:13:27Z
dc.date.issued 2016-12
dc.identifier.citation Herselman, M., Botha, A., Fogwill, T. and Alberts, R. 2016. Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania. In: Herselman, M and Botha, A. 2016. Strategies, Approaches and Experiences: Towards building a South African Digital Health Innovation Ecosystem. CSIR Meraka, Pretoria en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-0-7988-5632-4
dc.identifier.uri https://rehealthafrica.com/towards-building-south-african-digital-health-innovation-ecosystem/
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/9101
dc.description Chapter in: Strategies, Approaches and Experiences: Towards building a South African Digital Health Innovation Ecosystem. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. It is attributed to Prof Marlien Herselman and Prof Adèle Botha from CSIR, Meraka & UNISA, School of Computing. en_US
dc.description.abstract This part deals with the last phase of the DSRM process. It is essential to understand the limitations of the transfer of Finnish or European experience and technical solutions to South Africa. The specification and definition of potential South African users and beneficiaries of digital health systems, or the adaptation of the cost structure of solutions would probably be the traditional focus areas when considering the value of European examples for South Africa. Indeed, failure to appreciate the local context and user needs is a typical problem when people attempt to transfer solutions from Europe to Africa. However, learning from other countries at the system level requires that attention be paid to how the emerging South African Digital Health System is adapted, integrated and coordinated with South Africa’s national innovation system. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher CSIR en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;18092
dc.subject Digital Health Innovation Ecosystem en_US
dc.subject DHIE en_US
dc.subject Finnish technological transfers en_US
dc.subject European technological transfers en_US
dc.title Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania en_US
dc.title.alternative Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania en_US
dc.type Book Chapter en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Herselman, M. E., Botha, A., Fogwill, T., & Alberts, R. (2016). Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania., <i>Worklist;18092</i> CSIR. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/9101 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Herselman, Martha E, Adèle Botha, Thomas Fogwill, and Ronell Alberts. "Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania" In <i>WORKLIST;18092</i>, n.p.: CSIR. 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/9101. en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Herselman ME, Botha A, Fogwill T, Alberts R. Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania.. Worklist;18092. [place unknown]: CSIR; 2016. [cited yyyy month dd]. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/9101. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Book Chapter AU - Herselman, Martha E AU - Botha, Adèle AU - Fogwill, Thomas AU - Alberts, Ronell AB - This part deals with the last phase of the DSRM process. It is essential to understand the limitations of the transfer of Finnish or European experience and technical solutions to South Africa. The specification and definition of potential South African users and beneficiaries of digital health systems, or the adaptation of the cost structure of solutions would probably be the traditional focus areas when considering the value of European examples for South Africa. Indeed, failure to appreciate the local context and user needs is a typical problem when people attempt to transfer solutions from Europe to Africa. However, learning from other countries at the system level requires that attention be paid to how the emerging South African Digital Health System is adapted, integrated and coordinated with South Africa’s national innovation system. DA - 2016-12 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Digital Health Innovation Ecosystem KW - DHIE KW - Finnish technological transfers KW - European technological transfers LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2016 SM - 978-0-7988-5632-4 T1 - Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania TI - Phase 3: Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania T2 - Key findings from workshops in South Africa and Tanzania UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/9101 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record