ResearchSpace

Virtual learning system usage in Higher Education - A study at two South African institutions

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Padayachee, I
dc.contributor.author Van der Merwe, A
dc.contributor.author Kotzé, Paula
dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-11T10:55:45Z
dc.date.available 2016-07-11T10:55:45Z
dc.date.issued 2015-12
dc.identifier.citation Padayachee, I, Van der Merwe, A and Kotzé, P. 2015. Virtual learning system usage in Higher Education - A study at two South African institutions. South African Computer Journal, Vol 57, pp. 32-57 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1015-7999
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8625
dc.description Copyright: 2015 Creative Commons en_US
dc.description.abstract In higher education institutions various VLSs have been formally adopted to support online teaching and learning. However, there has been little research on patterns of VLS use among educators. The purpose of the research was to provide a descriptive analysis of VLS feature usage, and associated challenges at two South African higher education institutions. A case study research strategy was adopted, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to data collection and analysis. Survey findings revealed four clusters of VLS feature usage, namely, communication, management, content and pedagogic. Analysis showed that the ‘content cluster’ was used more than the other clusters. The average usage of the ‘pedagogic cluster’ for Durban University of Technology (DUT) was significantly greater than that of University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), which tentatively indicates that staff development seems to be an important aspect of VLS usage. There was no significant difference in the usage of the ‘communication’ and ‘management’ clusters between the two institutions, DUT and UKZN. The study contributes to the body of system utilisation research by confirming an uneven pattern of VLS feature usage among educators, whilst providing fresh insights into the challenges associated with the usage of two different VLSs in two different universities. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Creative Commons en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;16044
dc.subject Virtual learning environment usage en_US
dc.subject Course management systems en_US
dc.subject Learning management systems en_US
dc.subject e-Learning en_US
dc.subject Online teaching tools en_US
dc.subject Online learning tools en_US
dc.subject Virtual learning environment features en_US
dc.title Virtual learning system usage in Higher Education - A study at two South African institutions en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Padayachee, I., Van der Merwe, A., & Kotzé, P. (2015). Virtual learning system usage in Higher Education - A study at two South African institutions. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8625 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Padayachee, I, A Van der Merwe, and Paula Kotzé "Virtual learning system usage in Higher Education - A study at two South African institutions." (2015) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8625 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Padayachee I, Van der Merwe A, Kotzé P. Virtual learning system usage in Higher Education - A study at two South African institutions. 2015; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8625. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Padayachee, I AU - Van der Merwe, A AU - Kotzé, Paula AB - In higher education institutions various VLSs have been formally adopted to support online teaching and learning. However, there has been little research on patterns of VLS use among educators. The purpose of the research was to provide a descriptive analysis of VLS feature usage, and associated challenges at two South African higher education institutions. A case study research strategy was adopted, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to data collection and analysis. Survey findings revealed four clusters of VLS feature usage, namely, communication, management, content and pedagogic. Analysis showed that the ‘content cluster’ was used more than the other clusters. The average usage of the ‘pedagogic cluster’ for Durban University of Technology (DUT) was significantly greater than that of University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), which tentatively indicates that staff development seems to be an important aspect of VLS usage. There was no significant difference in the usage of the ‘communication’ and ‘management’ clusters between the two institutions, DUT and UKZN. The study contributes to the body of system utilisation research by confirming an uneven pattern of VLS feature usage among educators, whilst providing fresh insights into the challenges associated with the usage of two different VLSs in two different universities. DA - 2015-12 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Virtual learning environment usage KW - Course management systems KW - Learning management systems KW - e-Learning KW - Online teaching tools KW - Online learning tools KW - Virtual learning environment features LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2015 SM - 1015-7999 T1 - Virtual learning system usage in Higher Education - A study at two South African institutions TI - Virtual learning system usage in Higher Education - A study at two South African institutions UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8625 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record