ResearchSpace

The relevance of social theory in the practice of environmental management

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Meissner, Richard
dc.date.accessioned 2016-02-23T09:14:32Z
dc.date.available 2016-02-23T09:14:32Z
dc.date.issued 2015-09
dc.identifier.citation Meissner, R. 2015. The relevance of social theory in the practice of environmental management. Science and Engineering Ethics, pp. 1-16 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1353-3452
dc.identifier.uri http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11948-015-9700-y
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8419
dc.description 1. Copyright: 2015 Springer Verlag. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website. The definitive version of the work is published in Science and Engineering Ethics, pp. 1-16 en_US
dc.description.abstract In this paper I argue that the dominance of certain paradigms and theories on policies can have an influence on the value added by impact assessments. A link exists between paradigms and theories and policies and consequently the practices humans develop to tackle real world problems. I also argue that different types of thinking (contained in paradigms and theories) need to be integrated, at least at the scientific level, to enhance our understanding of social phenomena. This in turn can have a positive influence on policy processes that follow impact assessment recommendations. I am not arguing for the adoption of theoretical positions by practitioners, Instead, I contend that if impact assessments are informed by a variety of paradigms and theories, the policy practitioner might have a better understanding of the issue and the moral choices he or she needs to make. I will highlight the connection between theory and policies with practical examples from the social impact assessment of the De Hoop Dam, which was constructed on the Steelpoort River. I also argue for an integration of different theories to give a deeper understanding of real world problems. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer Verlag en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;15606
dc.subject De Hoop Dam en_US
dc.subject Impact assessment en_US
dc.subject Practice en_US
dc.subject Steelpoort River en_US
dc.subject Social theory en_US
dc.title The relevance of social theory in the practice of environmental management en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Meissner, R. (2015). The relevance of social theory in the practice of environmental management. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8419 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Meissner, Richard "The relevance of social theory in the practice of environmental management." (2015) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8419 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Meissner R. The relevance of social theory in the practice of environmental management. 2015; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8419. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Meissner, Richard AB - In this paper I argue that the dominance of certain paradigms and theories on policies can have an influence on the value added by impact assessments. A link exists between paradigms and theories and policies and consequently the practices humans develop to tackle real world problems. I also argue that different types of thinking (contained in paradigms and theories) need to be integrated, at least at the scientific level, to enhance our understanding of social phenomena. This in turn can have a positive influence on policy processes that follow impact assessment recommendations. I am not arguing for the adoption of theoretical positions by practitioners, Instead, I contend that if impact assessments are informed by a variety of paradigms and theories, the policy practitioner might have a better understanding of the issue and the moral choices he or she needs to make. I will highlight the connection between theory and policies with practical examples from the social impact assessment of the De Hoop Dam, which was constructed on the Steelpoort River. I also argue for an integration of different theories to give a deeper understanding of real world problems. DA - 2015-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - De Hoop Dam KW - Impact assessment KW - Practice KW - Steelpoort River KW - Social theory LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2015 SM - 1353-3452 T1 - The relevance of social theory in the practice of environmental management TI - The relevance of social theory in the practice of environmental management UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/8419 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record