dc.contributor.author |
Moodley, K
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Meyer, T
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sattler, U
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-10-27T07:48:45Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-10-27T07:48:45Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2014-08 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Moodley, K, Meyer, T and Sattler, U. 2014. Practical defeasible reasoning for description logics (STAIRS). In: European Starting AI Researcher Symposium, Prague, Czech Republic, 18-22 August 2014 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volumearticle/37208
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7742
|
|
dc.description |
European Starting AI Researcher Symposium, Prague, Czech Republic, 18-22 August 2014. Published in IOS Press. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Abstract. The preferential approach to nonmonotonic reasoning was consolidated
in depth by Krause, Lehmann and Magidor (KLM) for propositional
logic in the early 90's. In recent years, there have been e orts to
extend their framework to Description Logics (DLs) and a solid (though
preliminary) theoretical foundation has already been established towards
this aim. Despite this foundation, the generalisation of the propositional
framework to DLs is not yet complete and there are multiple
proposals for entailment in this context with no formal system for deciding
between these. In addition, there are virtually no existing preferential
reasoning implementations to speak of for DL-based ontologies.
The goals of this PhD are to provide a complete generalisation of the
preferential framework of KLM to the DL ALC, provide a formal understanding
of the relationships between the multiple proposals for entailment
in this context, and nally, to develop an accompanying defeasible
reasoning system for DL-based ontologies with performance that
is suitable for use in existing ontology development settings.
Keywords. Defeasible reasoning, Description Logics, Nonmonotonic
reasoning, Preferential reasoning, OWL, Protege, Exceptions |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
IOS Press |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Workflow;13518 |
|
dc.subject |
Ontologies |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Defeasible reasoning |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Description logics |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Nonmonotonic reasoning |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Preferential reasoning |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Protege |
en_US |
dc.title |
Practical defeasible reasoning for description logics (STAIRS) |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference Presentation |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Moodley, K., Meyer, T., & Sattler, U. (2014). Practical defeasible reasoning for description logics (STAIRS). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7742 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Moodley, K, T Meyer, and U Sattler. "Practical defeasible reasoning for description logics (STAIRS)." (2014): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7742 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Moodley K, Meyer T, Sattler U, Practical defeasible reasoning for description logics (STAIRS); IOS Press; 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7742 . |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Conference Presentation
AU - Moodley, K
AU - Meyer, T
AU - Sattler, U
AB - Abstract. The preferential approach to nonmonotonic reasoning was consolidated
in depth by Krause, Lehmann and Magidor (KLM) for propositional
logic in the early 90's. In recent years, there have been e orts to
extend their framework to Description Logics (DLs) and a solid (though
preliminary) theoretical foundation has already been established towards
this aim. Despite this foundation, the generalisation of the propositional
framework to DLs is not yet complete and there are multiple
proposals for entailment in this context with no formal system for deciding
between these. In addition, there are virtually no existing preferential
reasoning implementations to speak of for DL-based ontologies.
The goals of this PhD are to provide a complete generalisation of the
preferential framework of KLM to the DL ALC, provide a formal understanding
of the relationships between the multiple proposals for entailment
in this context, and nally, to develop an accompanying defeasible
reasoning system for DL-based ontologies with performance that
is suitable for use in existing ontology development settings.
Keywords. Defeasible reasoning, Description Logics, Nonmonotonic
reasoning, Preferential reasoning, OWL, Protege, Exceptions
DA - 2014-08
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Ontologies
KW - Defeasible reasoning
KW - Description logics
KW - Nonmonotonic reasoning
KW - Preferential reasoning
KW - Protege
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2014
T1 - Practical defeasible reasoning for description logics (STAIRS)
TI - Practical defeasible reasoning for description logics (STAIRS)
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7742
ER -
|
en_ZA |