ResearchSpace

Greenhouse gas network design using backward Lagrangian particle dispersion modelling – Part 2: Sensitivity analyses and South African test case

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nickless, A
dc.contributor.author Ziehn, T
dc.contributor.author Rayner, PJ
dc.contributor.author Scholes, RJ
dc.contributor.author Engelbrecht, F
dc.date.accessioned 2014-07-25T06:40:59Z
dc.date.available 2014-07-25T06:40:59Z
dc.date.issued 2014-05
dc.identifier.citation Nickless, A, Ziehn, T, Rayner, P.J, Scholes, R.J and Engelbrecht, F. 2014. Greenhouse gas network design using backward Lagrangian particle dispersion modelling – Part 2: Sensitivity analyses and South African test case. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, vol. 14, pp 11301-11342 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1680-7375
dc.identifier.uri http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/14/11301/2014/acpd-14-11301-2014.html
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7525
dc.description Copyright: 2014 European Geosciences Union (EGU). This is an OA journal. Published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, vol. 14, pp 11301-11342 en_US
dc.description.abstract This is the second part of a two-part paper considering network design based on a Lagrangian stochastic particle dispersion model (LPDM), aimed at reducing the uncertainty of the flux estimates achievable for the region of interest by the continuous observation of atmospheric CO(sub2) concentrations at fixed monitoring stations. The LPDM model, which can be used to derive the sensitivity matrix used in an inversion, was run for each potential site for the months of July (representative of the Southern Hemisphere Winter) and January (Summer). The magnitude of the boundary contributions to each potential observation site was tested to determine its inclusion in the network design, but found to be minimal. Through the use of the Bayesian inverse modelling technique, the sensitivity matrix, together with the prior estimates for the covariance matrices of the observations and surface fluxes were used to calculate the posterior covariance matrix of the estimated fluxes, used for the calculation of the cost function of the optimisation procedure. The optimisation procedure was carried out for South Africa under a standard set of conditions, similar to those applied to the Australian test case in Part 1, for both months and for the combined two months. The conditions were subtly changed, one at a time, and the optimisation routine re-run under each set of modified conditions, and compared to the original optimal network design. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher European Geosciences Union (EGU) en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;12995
dc.subject Inverse modelling en_US
dc.subject Optimal network design en_US
dc.subject Bayesian synthesis inversion en_US
dc.subject Lagrangian stochastic particle dispersion model en_US
dc.subject LPDM en_US
dc.subject Bayesian inverse modelling technique en_US
dc.title Greenhouse gas network design using backward Lagrangian particle dispersion modelling – Part 2: Sensitivity analyses and South African test case en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Nickless, A., Ziehn, T., Rayner, P., Scholes, R., & Engelbrecht, F. (2014). Greenhouse gas network design using backward Lagrangian particle dispersion modelling – Part 2: Sensitivity analyses and South African test case. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7525 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Nickless, A, T Ziehn, PJ Rayner, RJ Scholes, and F Engelbrecht "Greenhouse gas network design using backward Lagrangian particle dispersion modelling – Part 2: Sensitivity analyses and South African test case." (2014) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7525 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Nickless A, Ziehn T, Rayner P, Scholes R, Engelbrecht F. Greenhouse gas network design using backward Lagrangian particle dispersion modelling – Part 2: Sensitivity analyses and South African test case. 2014; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7525. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Nickless, A AU - Ziehn, T AU - Rayner, PJ AU - Scholes, RJ AU - Engelbrecht, F AB - This is the second part of a two-part paper considering network design based on a Lagrangian stochastic particle dispersion model (LPDM), aimed at reducing the uncertainty of the flux estimates achievable for the region of interest by the continuous observation of atmospheric CO(sub2) concentrations at fixed monitoring stations. The LPDM model, which can be used to derive the sensitivity matrix used in an inversion, was run for each potential site for the months of July (representative of the Southern Hemisphere Winter) and January (Summer). The magnitude of the boundary contributions to each potential observation site was tested to determine its inclusion in the network design, but found to be minimal. Through the use of the Bayesian inverse modelling technique, the sensitivity matrix, together with the prior estimates for the covariance matrices of the observations and surface fluxes were used to calculate the posterior covariance matrix of the estimated fluxes, used for the calculation of the cost function of the optimisation procedure. The optimisation procedure was carried out for South Africa under a standard set of conditions, similar to those applied to the Australian test case in Part 1, for both months and for the combined two months. The conditions were subtly changed, one at a time, and the optimisation routine re-run under each set of modified conditions, and compared to the original optimal network design. DA - 2014-05 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Inverse modelling KW - Optimal network design KW - Bayesian synthesis inversion KW - Lagrangian stochastic particle dispersion model KW - LPDM KW - Bayesian inverse modelling technique LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2014 SM - 1680-7375 T1 - Greenhouse gas network design using backward Lagrangian particle dispersion modelling – Part 2: Sensitivity analyses and South African test case TI - Greenhouse gas network design using backward Lagrangian particle dispersion modelling – Part 2: Sensitivity analyses and South African test case UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/7525 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record