dc.contributor.author |
Oboirien, BO
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ojumu, TV
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Obayopo, SO
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-09-30T08:04:02Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-09-30T08:04:02Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013-02 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Oboirien, B.O, Ojumu, T.V and Obayopo, S.O. 2013. Fungi solubilisation of low rank coal: Performances of stirred tank, fluidised bed and packed bed reactors. Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 106, pp 295-302 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0378-3820 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0378382012003049/1-s2.0-S0378382012003049-main.pdf?_tid=f689828e-2447-11e3-9dae-00000aab0f26&acdnat=1379937906_e2ab6f13543d17d91ee10edc1c623112
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6961
|
|
dc.description |
Copyright: 2013 Elsevier. This is an ABSTRACT ONLY. The definitive version is published in Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 106, pp 295-302 |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Coal biosolubilisation was investigated in stirred tank reactor, fluidised bed and fixed bed bioreactors with a view to highlight the advantages and shortcomings of each of these reactor configurations. The stirred aerated bioreactor and fluidised bioreactor represent slurry reactor systems enabling a comparative study. Direct comparison between these and the fixed bed bioreactor could not be carried as the corresponding particle sizes will result to a pressure drop in the fixed bed reactor. Coal solubilisation showed a higher coal weight loss in the stirred tank slurry bioreactor in comparison to the fluidised bed slurry bioreactor at 5% (w/v) coal loading and 600–850 µm coal fractions. Higher aeration is required in the fluidised bed bioreactor than in the stirred tank slurry bioreactor at constant coal loading and particle size because in fluidised bed bioreactor aeration was also used for mixing. Coal biosolubilisation in the packed bed bioreactor was minimal. The low performance was attributed to the large coal particle size fraction (1.5–2 mm) used. Minimal damage to the fungal culture was observed. However, clogging of bed by fungi resulted in channelling or misdistribution that ultimately leads to poor and unpredictable internal mass transport. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Workflow;11491 |
|
dc.subject |
Fungal solubilisation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Low rank coal |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Stirred tank reactor |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Fluidised bed reactor |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Fixed bed reactor |
en_US |
dc.title |
Fungi solubilisation of low rank coal: performances of stirred tank, fluidised bed and packed bed reactors |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Oboirien, B., Ojumu, T., & Obayopo, S. (2013). Fungi solubilisation of low rank coal: performances of stirred tank, fluidised bed and packed bed reactors. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6961 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Oboirien, BO, TV Ojumu, and SO Obayopo "Fungi solubilisation of low rank coal: performances of stirred tank, fluidised bed and packed bed reactors." (2013) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6961 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Oboirien B, Ojumu T, Obayopo S. Fungi solubilisation of low rank coal: performances of stirred tank, fluidised bed and packed bed reactors. 2013; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6961. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - Oboirien, BO
AU - Ojumu, TV
AU - Obayopo, SO
AB - Coal biosolubilisation was investigated in stirred tank reactor, fluidised bed and fixed bed bioreactors with a view to highlight the advantages and shortcomings of each of these reactor configurations. The stirred aerated bioreactor and fluidised bioreactor represent slurry reactor systems enabling a comparative study. Direct comparison between these and the fixed bed bioreactor could not be carried as the corresponding particle sizes will result to a pressure drop in the fixed bed reactor. Coal solubilisation showed a higher coal weight loss in the stirred tank slurry bioreactor in comparison to the fluidised bed slurry bioreactor at 5% (w/v) coal loading and 600–850 µm coal fractions. Higher aeration is required in the fluidised bed bioreactor than in the stirred tank slurry bioreactor at constant coal loading and particle size because in fluidised bed bioreactor aeration was also used for mixing. Coal biosolubilisation in the packed bed bioreactor was minimal. The low performance was attributed to the large coal particle size fraction (1.5–2 mm) used. Minimal damage to the fungal culture was observed. However, clogging of bed by fungi resulted in channelling or misdistribution that ultimately leads to poor and unpredictable internal mass transport.
DA - 2013-02
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Fungal solubilisation
KW - Low rank coal
KW - Stirred tank reactor
KW - Fluidised bed reactor
KW - Fixed bed reactor
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2013
SM - 0378-3820
T1 - Fungi solubilisation of low rank coal: performances of stirred tank, fluidised bed and packed bed reactors
TI - Fungi solubilisation of low rank coal: performances of stirred tank, fluidised bed and packed bed reactors
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6961
ER -
|
en_ZA |