dc.contributor.author |
Britz, K
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Varzinczak, I
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-06-18T11:05:01Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-06-18T11:05:01Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013-01 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Britz, K and Varzinczak, I. 2013. Defeasible modalities. In: Fourteenth conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK), Chennai, India, 7-9 January 2013 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://www.cair.za.net/sites/default/files/outputs/TARK-DefModalities.pdf
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6801
|
|
dc.description |
Fourteenth conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK), Chennai, India, 7-9 January 2013. Published in Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Nonmonotonic logics are usually characterized by the presence of some notion of `conditional' that fails monotonicity. Research on nonmonotonic logics is therefore largely concerned with the defeasibility of argument forms and the associated normality (or abnormality) of its constituents. In contrast, defeasible modes of inference aim to formalize the defeasible aspects of modal notions such as actions, obligations and knowledge. In this work we enrich the standard possible worlds semantics with a preference ordering on worlds in Kripke models. The resulting family of modal logics allow for the elegant expression of defeasible modalities. We also propose a tableau calculus which is sound and complete with respect to our preferential semantics. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Workflow;11037 |
|
dc.subject |
Knowledge representation and reasoning |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Modal logic |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Preferential semantics |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Defeasible modes of inference |
en_US |
dc.title |
Defeasible modalities |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference Presentation |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Britz, K., & Varzinczak, I. (2013). Defeasible modalities. Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6801 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Britz, K, and I Varzinczak. "Defeasible modalities." (2013): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6801 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Britz K, Varzinczak I, Defeasible modalities; Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research; 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6801 . |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Conference Presentation
AU - Britz, K
AU - Varzinczak, I
AB - Nonmonotonic logics are usually characterized by the presence of some notion of `conditional' that fails monotonicity. Research on nonmonotonic logics is therefore largely concerned with the defeasibility of argument forms and the associated normality (or abnormality) of its constituents. In contrast, defeasible modes of inference aim to formalize the defeasible aspects of modal notions such as actions, obligations and knowledge. In this work we enrich the standard possible worlds semantics with a preference ordering on worlds in Kripke models. The resulting family of modal logics allow for the elegant expression of defeasible modalities. We also propose a tableau calculus which is sound and complete with respect to our preferential semantics.
DA - 2013-01
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Knowledge representation and reasoning
KW - Modal logic
KW - Preferential semantics
KW - Defeasible modes of inference
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2013
T1 - Defeasible modalities
TI - Defeasible modalities
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6801
ER -
|
en_ZA |