ResearchSpace

Comparing grapheme-based and phoneme-based speech recognition for Afrikaans

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Basson, WD
dc.contributor.author Davel, MH
dc.date.accessioned 2013-01-30T07:39:16Z
dc.date.available 2013-01-30T07:39:16Z
dc.date.issued 2012-11
dc.identifier.citation Basson, W.D and Davel, M.H. 2012. Comparing grapheme-based and phoneme-based speech recognition for Afrikaans. In: PRASA 2012, CSIR International Convention Centre, Pretoria, 29-30 November 2012 en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-0-620-54601-0
dc.identifier.uri http://www.prasa.org/index.php/2012-03-07-10-55-15
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6492
dc.description PRASA 2012, CSIR International Convention Centre, Pretoria, 29-30 November 2012 en_US
dc.description.abstract This paper compares the recognition accuracy of a phoneme-based automatic speech recognition system with that of a grapheme-based system, using Afrikaans as case study. The first system is developed using a conventional pronunciation dictionary, while the latter system uses the letters of each word directly as the acoustic units to be modelled. We ensure that the pronunciation dictionary we use is highly accurate and then investigate the extent to which ASR performance degrades when the dictionary is removed.We analyse this effect at different data set sizes and classify the causes of performance degradation. With grapheme-based ASR outperforming phoneme-based ASR in certain word categories, we find that relative error rates are highly dependent on word category, which points towards strategies for compensating for grapheme-based inaccuracies. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher PRASA 2012 en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;10205
dc.subject Automatic speech recognition en_US
dc.subject ASR en_US
dc.subject Grapheme-based system en_US
dc.title Comparing grapheme-based and phoneme-based speech recognition for Afrikaans en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Basson, W., & Davel, M. (2012). Comparing grapheme-based and phoneme-based speech recognition for Afrikaans. PRASA 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6492 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Basson, WD, and MH Davel. "Comparing grapheme-based and phoneme-based speech recognition for Afrikaans." (2012): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6492 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Basson W, Davel M, Comparing grapheme-based and phoneme-based speech recognition for Afrikaans; PRASA 2012; 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6492 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Basson, WD AU - Davel, MH AB - This paper compares the recognition accuracy of a phoneme-based automatic speech recognition system with that of a grapheme-based system, using Afrikaans as case study. The first system is developed using a conventional pronunciation dictionary, while the latter system uses the letters of each word directly as the acoustic units to be modelled. We ensure that the pronunciation dictionary we use is highly accurate and then investigate the extent to which ASR performance degrades when the dictionary is removed.We analyse this effect at different data set sizes and classify the causes of performance degradation. With grapheme-based ASR outperforming phoneme-based ASR in certain word categories, we find that relative error rates are highly dependent on word category, which points towards strategies for compensating for grapheme-based inaccuracies. DA - 2012-11 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Automatic speech recognition KW - ASR KW - Grapheme-based system LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2012 SM - 978-0-620-54601-0 T1 - Comparing grapheme-based and phoneme-based speech recognition for Afrikaans TI - Comparing grapheme-based and phoneme-based speech recognition for Afrikaans UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6492 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record