dc.contributor.author |
Keet, CM
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-11-22T12:58:36Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-11-22T12:58:36Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012-10 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Keet, CM. Detecting and revising flaws in OWL object property expressions. 18th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Galway City, Ireland, 8-12 October 2012 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://www.meteck.org/files/EKAW12subProsChains.pdf
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6361
|
|
dc.description |
18th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Galway City, Ireland, 8-12 October 2012 |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
OWL 2 DL is a very expressive language and has many features for declaring complex object property expressions. Standard reasoning services for OWL ontologies assume the axioms in the "object property box" to be correct and according to the ontologist's intention. However, the more one can do, the higher the chance modelling flaws are introduced; hence, an unexpected or undesired classification or inconsistency may actually be due to a mistake in the object property box, not the class axioms. We identify the types of flaws that can occur in the object property box and propose corresponding compatibility services, SubProS and ProChainS, that check for meaningful property hierarchies and property chaining and propose how to revise a flaw. SubProS and ProChainS were evaluated with several ontologies, demonstrating they indeed do serve to isolate flaws and can propose useful corrections. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Workflow;9905 |
|
dc.subject |
OWL 2 DL |
en_US |
dc.subject |
OWL ontologies |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Modelling flaws |
en_US |
dc.title |
Detecting and revising flaws in OWL object property expressions |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference Presentation |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Keet, C. (2012). Detecting and revising flaws in OWL object property expressions. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6361 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Keet, CM. "Detecting and revising flaws in OWL object property expressions." (2012): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6361 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Keet C, Detecting and revising flaws in OWL object property expressions; 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6361 . |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Conference Presentation
AU - Keet, CM
AB - OWL 2 DL is a very expressive language and has many features for declaring complex object property expressions. Standard reasoning services for OWL ontologies assume the axioms in the "object property box" to be correct and according to the ontologist's intention. However, the more one can do, the higher the chance modelling flaws are introduced; hence, an unexpected or undesired classification or inconsistency may actually be due to a mistake in the object property box, not the class axioms. We identify the types of flaws that can occur in the object property box and propose corresponding compatibility services, SubProS and ProChainS, that check for meaningful property hierarchies and property chaining and propose how to revise a flaw. SubProS and ProChainS were evaluated with several ontologies, demonstrating they indeed do serve to isolate flaws and can propose useful corrections.
DA - 2012-10
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - OWL 2 DL
KW - OWL ontologies
KW - Modelling flaws
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2012
T1 - Detecting and revising flaws in OWL object property expressions
TI - Detecting and revising flaws in OWL object property expressions
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/6361
ER -
|
en_ZA |