ResearchSpace

Costs, benefits and management options for an invasive alien tree species: the case of mesquite in the Northern Cape, South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wise, RM
dc.contributor.author Van Wilgen, BW
dc.contributor.author Le Maitre, David C
dc.date.accessioned 2012-06-29T15:03:47Z
dc.date.available 2012-06-29T15:03:47Z
dc.date.issued 2012-08
dc.identifier.citation Wise, RM, Van Wilgen, BW and Le Maitre, DC. 2012. Costs, benefits and management options for an invasive alien tree species: the case of mesquite in the Northern Cape, South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 84, pp 80-90 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0140-1963
dc.identifier.uri http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196312001012
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5960
dc.description Copyright: 2012 Elsevier. This is the pre-print version of the work. The definitive version is published in the Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 84, pp 80-90 en_US
dc.description.abstract Mesquite (Prosopis species) were introduced to South Africa to provide fodder and shade for livestock, but some have become invasive, impacting on water and grazing resources. Mesquite’s net economic effects are unclear and their unequal distribution leads to conflict. We estimated the value of mesquite invasions in the Northern Cape Province for different scenarios, differentiating between productive floodplains and upland areas. The estimated net economic value of mesquite in 2009, covering 1.47 million ha, was US$3.5–15.3 million. The value will become negative within 4–22 years, assuming annual rates of spread of 30 and 15%, respectively. The estimated 30-year present value (3% discount rate) of the benefits of control in the floodplains exceeded that of costs but the opposite was true in the uplands. Control efforts should therefore focus on floodplains while preventing spread from uplands into cleared or uninvaded floodplains. More efficient control methods are needed as estimated control costs (>US$9.5 million yr-1) exceed financial capabilities of Public Works programmes. Control in the floodplains was not economically justifiable using an 8% discount rate, because this substantially discounted future costs. We conclude that more effective control methods, such as biological control, are needed to prevent substantial economic losses. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;9201
dc.subject Biological control en_US
dc.subject Conflicts of interest en_US
dc.subject Economic analysis en_US
dc.subject Grazing en_US
dc.subject Prosopis (mesquite) en_US
dc.subject Water resources en_US
dc.subject Invasive alien trees en_US
dc.title Costs, benefits and management options for an invasive alien tree species: the case of mesquite in the Northern Cape, South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Wise, R., Van Wilgen, B., & Le Maitre, D. C. (2012). Costs, benefits and management options for an invasive alien tree species: the case of mesquite in the Northern Cape, South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5960 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Wise, RM, BW Van Wilgen, and David C Le Maitre "Costs, benefits and management options for an invasive alien tree species: the case of mesquite in the Northern Cape, South Africa." (2012) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5960 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Wise R, Van Wilgen B, Le Maitre DC. Costs, benefits and management options for an invasive alien tree species: the case of mesquite in the Northern Cape, South Africa. 2012; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5960. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Wise, RM AU - Van Wilgen, BW AU - Le Maitre, David C AB - Mesquite (Prosopis species) were introduced to South Africa to provide fodder and shade for livestock, but some have become invasive, impacting on water and grazing resources. Mesquite’s net economic effects are unclear and their unequal distribution leads to conflict. We estimated the value of mesquite invasions in the Northern Cape Province for different scenarios, differentiating between productive floodplains and upland areas. The estimated net economic value of mesquite in 2009, covering 1.47 million ha, was US$3.5–15.3 million. The value will become negative within 4–22 years, assuming annual rates of spread of 30 and 15%, respectively. The estimated 30-year present value (3% discount rate) of the benefits of control in the floodplains exceeded that of costs but the opposite was true in the uplands. Control efforts should therefore focus on floodplains while preventing spread from uplands into cleared or uninvaded floodplains. More efficient control methods are needed as estimated control costs (>US$9.5 million yr-1) exceed financial capabilities of Public Works programmes. Control in the floodplains was not economically justifiable using an 8% discount rate, because this substantially discounted future costs. We conclude that more effective control methods, such as biological control, are needed to prevent substantial economic losses. DA - 2012-08 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Biological control KW - Conflicts of interest KW - Economic analysis KW - Grazing KW - Prosopis (mesquite) KW - Water resources KW - Invasive alien trees LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2012 SM - 0140-1963 T1 - Costs, benefits and management options for an invasive alien tree species: the case of mesquite in the Northern Cape, South Africa TI - Costs, benefits and management options for an invasive alien tree species: the case of mesquite in the Northern Cape, South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/5960 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record