ResearchSpace

Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author McConnachie, AJ
dc.contributor.author De Wit, MP
dc.contributor.author Hill, MP
dc.contributor.author Byrne, MJ
dc.date.accessioned 2007-06-12T07:40:12Z
dc.date.available 2007-06-12T07:40:12Z
dc.date.issued 2003-09
dc.identifier.citation McConnachie, AJ, et al. 2003. Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa. Biological Control, vol 28 (1), pp 25-32 en
dc.identifier.issn 1049-9644
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/559
dc.description Copyright: 2003 Elsevier Science (USA) en
dc.description.abstract Azolla filiculoides (red water fern) is a floating fern native to South America which has invaded aquatic ecosystems in South Africa. Thick mats of A. filiculoides on dams and slow-moving water bodies cause economic losses to water-users. Affected water users were surveyed using a questionnaire to assess the importance of the weed. Among those most seriously affected were farming (71%), recreational (24%), and municipal (5%) users. The average water area covered by A. filiculoides (per water-user) was 2.17 ha, with an expansion rate of 1.33 ha per year. The frond-feeding weevil Stenopelmus rufinasus was released as a biological control agent at the end of 1997. Within 3 years, the weevil had reduced the weed population to the point that it was no longer considered a problem in South Africa. The results reflect the dynamics of biological control on site-specific survey information, and place higher benefit–cost ratios achieved in other national level studies in a better context. It also raises the important policy question of who is responsible to finance such control programs in future, because on-site benefits of control are enough to justify the program in its own right. The paper concludes with recommendations on a financial mechanism to address biological control of invasive species in a sustainable manner. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Elsevier Science (USA) en
dc.subject Red waterferns en
dc.subject Stenopelmus rufinasus en
dc.subject Benefit-cost ratios en
dc.title Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa en
dc.type Article en
dc.identifier.apacitation McConnachie, A., De Wit, M., Hill, M., & Byrne, M. (2003). Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/559 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation McConnachie, AJ, MP De Wit, MP Hill, and MJ Byrne "Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa." (2003) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/559 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation McConnachie A, De Wit M, Hill M, Byrne M. Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa. 2003; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/559. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - McConnachie, AJ AU - De Wit, MP AU - Hill, MP AU - Byrne, MJ AB - Azolla filiculoides (red water fern) is a floating fern native to South America which has invaded aquatic ecosystems in South Africa. Thick mats of A. filiculoides on dams and slow-moving water bodies cause economic losses to water-users. Affected water users were surveyed using a questionnaire to assess the importance of the weed. Among those most seriously affected were farming (71%), recreational (24%), and municipal (5%) users. The average water area covered by A. filiculoides (per water-user) was 2.17 ha, with an expansion rate of 1.33 ha per year. The frond-feeding weevil Stenopelmus rufinasus was released as a biological control agent at the end of 1997. Within 3 years, the weevil had reduced the weed population to the point that it was no longer considered a problem in South Africa. The results reflect the dynamics of biological control on site-specific survey information, and place higher benefit–cost ratios achieved in other national level studies in a better context. It also raises the important policy question of who is responsible to finance such control programs in future, because on-site benefits of control are enough to justify the program in its own right. The paper concludes with recommendations on a financial mechanism to address biological control of invasive species in a sustainable manner. DA - 2003-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Red waterferns KW - Stenopelmus rufinasus KW - Benefit-cost ratios LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2003 SM - 1049-9644 T1 - Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa TI - Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/559 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record