dc.contributor.author |
McConnachie, AJ
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
De Wit, MP
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hill, MP
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Byrne, MJ
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-06-12T07:40:12Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2007-06-12T07:40:12Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2003-09 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
McConnachie, AJ, et al. 2003. Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa. Biological Control, vol 28 (1), pp 25-32 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
1049-9644 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/559
|
|
dc.description |
Copyright: 2003 Elsevier Science (USA) |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Azolla filiculoides (red water fern) is a floating fern native to South America which has invaded aquatic ecosystems in South Africa. Thick mats of A. filiculoides on dams and slow-moving water bodies cause economic losses to water-users. Affected water users were surveyed using a questionnaire to assess the importance of the weed. Among those most seriously affected were farming (71%), recreational (24%), and municipal (5%) users. The average water area covered by A. filiculoides (per water-user) was 2.17 ha, with an expansion rate of 1.33 ha per year. The frond-feeding weevil Stenopelmus rufinasus was released as a biological control agent at the end of 1997. Within 3 years, the weevil had reduced the weed population to the point that it was no longer considered a problem in South Africa. The results reflect the dynamics of biological control on site-specific survey information, and place higher benefit–cost ratios achieved in other national level studies in a better context. It also raises the important policy question of who is responsible to finance such control programs in future, because on-site benefits of control are enough to justify the program in its own right. The paper concludes with recommendations on a financial mechanism to address biological control of invasive species in a sustainable manner. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier Science (USA) |
en |
dc.subject |
Red waterferns |
en |
dc.subject |
Stenopelmus rufinasus |
en |
dc.subject |
Benefit-cost ratios |
en |
dc.title |
Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
McConnachie, A., De Wit, M., Hill, M., & Byrne, M. (2003). Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/559 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
McConnachie, AJ, MP De Wit, MP Hill, and MJ Byrne "Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa." (2003) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/559 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
McConnachie A, De Wit M, Hill M, Byrne M. Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa. 2003; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/559. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - McConnachie, AJ
AU - De Wit, MP
AU - Hill, MP
AU - Byrne, MJ
AB - Azolla filiculoides (red water fern) is a floating fern native to South America which has invaded aquatic ecosystems in South Africa. Thick mats of A. filiculoides on dams and slow-moving water bodies cause economic losses to water-users. Affected water users were surveyed using a questionnaire to assess the importance of the weed. Among those most seriously affected were farming (71%), recreational (24%), and municipal (5%) users. The average water area covered by A. filiculoides (per water-user) was 2.17 ha, with an expansion rate of 1.33 ha per year. The frond-feeding weevil Stenopelmus rufinasus was released as a biological control agent at the end of 1997. Within 3 years, the weevil had reduced the weed population to the point that it was no longer considered a problem in South Africa. The results reflect the dynamics of biological control on site-specific survey information, and place higher benefit–cost ratios achieved in other national level studies in a better context. It also raises the important policy question of who is responsible to finance such control programs in future, because on-site benefits of control are enough to justify the program in its own right. The paper concludes with recommendations on a financial mechanism to address biological control of invasive species in a sustainable manner.
DA - 2003-09
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Red waterferns
KW - Stenopelmus rufinasus
KW - Benefit-cost ratios
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2003
SM - 1049-9644
T1 - Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa
TI - Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/559
ER -
|
en_ZA |