dc.contributor.author |
Grobler, MM
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dlamini, IZ
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-07-23T14:25:06Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-07-23T14:25:06Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Grobler, MM,Dlamini, IZ. 2010. Managing digital evidence: the governance of digital forensics. Journal of Contemporary Management, Vol. 7, pp 1-21 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
1815-7440 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&portal=ejournal&next=images/ejour/jcman/jcman_v7_a1.pdf
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4125
|
|
dc.description |
Copyright: 2010 Sabinet Online Ltd |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Governance in general is becoming increasingly important in contemporary management, but specifically the governance of Digital Forensics. In order to manage governance disciplines effectively, closer attention needs to be paid to the technical aspects of specialised fields covered within an organisation. This paper presents a novel, scientific definition of Digital Forensic (DF) governance and a preliminary best practice framework. DF involves the preservation, identification, extraction and documentation of digital evidence stored as data or magnetically encoded information (Vacca 2002:731). This extends to include the recovery, analysis and presentation of digital evidence in a way that is admissible and appropriate in a court of law. This necessitates a crucial accuracy in following forensic procedures, the rules of evidence and the legal processes. In short, DF pertains to any digital artifacts found in computers or other digital resources that may have legal value in the business environment. The purpose of this article is to present a scientific definition for the DF governance discipline, as well as a preliminary best practice framework. At the time of writing, no formal definition or framework could be found, supporting the notion to develop this discipline. To enable this purpose, the article will conduct a brief literature overview on existing governance literature, explore current research on DF governance and present a definition and framework for DF governance |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
SA ePublications |
en |
dc.subject |
Governance |
en |
dc.subject |
Digital forensics |
en |
dc.subject |
Information technology |
en |
dc.subject |
Information security |
en |
dc.subject |
Digital artifacts |
en |
dc.subject |
Digital resources |
en |
dc.title |
Managing digital evidence: the governance of digital forensics |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Grobler, M., & Dlamini, I. (2010). Managing digital evidence: the governance of digital forensics. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4125 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Grobler, MM, and IZ Dlamini "Managing digital evidence: the governance of digital forensics." (2010) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4125 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Grobler M, Dlamini I. Managing digital evidence: the governance of digital forensics. 2010; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4125. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - Grobler, MM
AU - Dlamini, IZ
AB - Governance in general is becoming increasingly important in contemporary management, but specifically the governance of Digital Forensics. In order to manage governance disciplines effectively, closer attention needs to be paid to the technical aspects of specialised fields covered within an organisation. This paper presents a novel, scientific definition of Digital Forensic (DF) governance and a preliminary best practice framework. DF involves the preservation, identification, extraction and documentation of digital evidence stored as data or magnetically encoded information (Vacca 2002:731). This extends to include the recovery, analysis and presentation of digital evidence in a way that is admissible and appropriate in a court of law. This necessitates a crucial accuracy in following forensic procedures, the rules of evidence and the legal processes. In short, DF pertains to any digital artifacts found in computers or other digital resources that may have legal value in the business environment. The purpose of this article is to present a scientific definition for the DF governance discipline, as well as a preliminary best practice framework. At the time of writing, no formal definition or framework could be found, supporting the notion to develop this discipline. To enable this purpose, the article will conduct a brief literature overview on existing governance literature, explore current research on DF governance and present a definition and framework for DF governance
DA - 2010
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Governance
KW - Digital forensics
KW - Information technology
KW - Information security
KW - Digital artifacts
KW - Digital resources
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2010
SM - 1815-7440
T1 - Managing digital evidence: the governance of digital forensics
TI - Managing digital evidence: the governance of digital forensics
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4125
ER -
|
en_ZA |