dc.contributor.author |
Nahman, Anton
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Godfrey, Linda K
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-07-02T13:21:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-07-02T13:21:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Nahman, A and Godfrey, L.K.. 2009. Economic instruments for solid waste management in South Africa: opportunities and constraints. Resources Conservation and Recycling, Vol 54(8), pp 521–531 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0921-3449 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6VDX-4XNVTDH-2-7&_cdi=5994&_user=958262&_pii=S092134490900233X&_orig=search&_coverDate=06%2F30%2F2010&_sk=999459991&view=c&wchp=dGLbVlz-zSkzk&md5=cc1d295ad9055d89b3d9d5ed59ca7e1b&ie=/sdarticle.pdf
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4055
|
|
dc.description |
Copyright: Elsevier 2009. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Elsevier for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in journal, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 54, pp 521–531 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
This paper presents results from a survey of waste management authorities regarding the opportunities and constraints associated with the implementation of economic instruments for solid waste management in South Africa. Almost all respondents felt that EIs could lead to reduced waste generation and increased diversion of waste from landfill to recycling, and that they should eventually be implemented in the field of SWM in SA, although opinions varied as to the appropriate timeframe for implementation. The general consensus was that a number of fundamentals had to be in place first. However, this does not imply that the potential of EIs should be ignored. Instead, institutional limitations must be taken into account in the selection, design and implementation of such instruments. Indeed, it is proposed that EIs can be designed and implemented in an innovative, incremental way whereby capacity and experience are gradually developed over time. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en |
dc.subject |
Economic instruments |
en |
dc.subject |
Solid waste management |
en |
dc.subject |
Product tax |
en |
dc.subject |
Deposit-refund scheme |
en |
dc.subject |
Quantity-based user charge |
en |
dc.subject |
Recycle |
en |
dc.title |
Economic instruments for solid waste management in South Africa: opportunities and constraints |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Nahman, A., & Godfrey, L. K. (2009). Economic instruments for solid waste management in South Africa: opportunities and constraints. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4055 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Nahman, Anton, and Linda K Godfrey "Economic instruments for solid waste management in South Africa: opportunities and constraints." (2009) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4055 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Nahman A, Godfrey LK. Economic instruments for solid waste management in South Africa: opportunities and constraints. 2009; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4055. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - Nahman, Anton
AU - Godfrey, Linda K
AB - This paper presents results from a survey of waste management authorities regarding the opportunities and constraints associated with the implementation of economic instruments for solid waste management in South Africa. Almost all respondents felt that EIs could lead to reduced waste generation and increased diversion of waste from landfill to recycling, and that they should eventually be implemented in the field of SWM in SA, although opinions varied as to the appropriate timeframe for implementation. The general consensus was that a number of fundamentals had to be in place first. However, this does not imply that the potential of EIs should be ignored. Instead, institutional limitations must be taken into account in the selection, design and implementation of such instruments. Indeed, it is proposed that EIs can be designed and implemented in an innovative, incremental way whereby capacity and experience are gradually developed over time.
DA - 2009
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Economic instruments
KW - Solid waste management
KW - Product tax
KW - Deposit-refund scheme
KW - Quantity-based user charge
KW - Recycle
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2009
SM - 0921-3449
T1 - Economic instruments for solid waste management in South Africa: opportunities and constraints
TI - Economic instruments for solid waste management in South Africa: opportunities and constraints
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/4055
ER -
|
en_ZA |