ResearchSpace

Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Baumbach, J
dc.date.accessioned 2009-02-18T11:18:36Z
dc.date.available 2009-02-18T11:18:36Z
dc.date.issued 2008-10
dc.identifier.citation Baumbach, J. 2008. Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures. Land Warfare Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 27 - 31 October 2008, pp 29-34 en
dc.identifier.isbn 0642705585
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3029
dc.description Land Warfare Conference 2008 en
dc.description.abstract The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Law of Comparative Judgement (LCJ) are pairwise comparison methods. A large number of observers need to perform an LCJ evaluation in order to get accurate results. LCJ also does not provide an absolute scale of performance, nor does it provide a metric to evaluate the accuracy of the evaluation. Abovementioned shortcomings were addressed using AHP en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Analytical hierarchy process en
dc.subject Law of comparative judgement en
dc.subject LCJ en
dc.subject AHP en
dc.subject Target signatures en
dc.title Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures en
dc.type Conference Presentation en
dc.identifier.apacitation Baumbach, J. (2008). Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3029 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Baumbach, J. "Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures." (2008): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3029 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Baumbach J, Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures; 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3029 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Baumbach, J AB - The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Law of Comparative Judgement (LCJ) are pairwise comparison methods. A large number of observers need to perform an LCJ evaluation in order to get accurate results. LCJ also does not provide an absolute scale of performance, nor does it provide a metric to evaluate the accuracy of the evaluation. Abovementioned shortcomings were addressed using AHP DA - 2008-10 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Analytical hierarchy process KW - Law of comparative judgement KW - LCJ KW - AHP KW - Target signatures LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2008 SM - 0642705585 T1 - Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures TI - Using the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate target signatures UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3029 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name: Baumbach_2008.pdf
Size: 161.1Kb
Format: PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record