dc.contributor.author |
MacPhail, C
|
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Campbell, C
|
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-03-28T08:06:23Z |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-06-07T10:06:23Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2007-03-28T08:06:23Z |
en_US |
dc.date.available |
2007-06-07T10:06:23Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
|
en_US |
dc.date.issued |
1999-12 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
MacPhail, C and Campbell, C. 1999. Evaluating HIV/STD interventions in developing countries: do current indicators do justice to advances in intervention approaches?. South African Journal of Psychology, vol. 29(4), pp 149-165 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0081-2463 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2141
|
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2141
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
HIV continues to spread unabated in many developing countries. Here the interventions that are currently in place are considered and the methods that are being used to evaluate them as reported in the published literature are critically discussed. In recent years there has been a move away from highly individual-oriented interventions towards more participatory approaches that emphasise techniques such as community-led peer education and group discussions. However, this move towards more community orientated intervention techniques has not been matched by the development of evaluation methods with which to capture and explain the community and social changes which are often necessary preconditions for health-enhancing behaviour change. Evaluation research continues to rely on quantitative methodologies that fail to elucidate the complex changes that the newer interventions seek to promote within target communities. In addition, these methods of evaluation tend to rely on the use of highly individualistic and quantitative biomedical indicators such as HIV/STD rates, or knowledge, attitude, perception and behaviour (KAPB) survey questionnaires. The author argue that such approaches are inadequate for the task of tracking and measuring important determinants of programme success such as psycho-social changes, features of the community-intervention interface and the degree of trust and identification with which members of target communities regard particular interventions. Rigorously conducted qualitative process evaluations taking account of the above factors could make a key contribution to the development of more successful HIV-prevention interventions. |
en_US |
dc.format.extent |
121986 bytes |
en_US |
dc.format.mimetype |
text/html |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Bureau Scientific Publications |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Copyright: 1999 South African Journal of Psychology |
en_US |
dc.source |
|
en_US |
dc.subject |
HIV infections |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Preventive health services |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Sexually transmitted diseases |
en_US |
dc.title |
Evaluating HIV/STD interventions in developing countries: do current indicators do justice to advances in intervention approaches? |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
MacPhail, C., & Campbell, C. (1999). Evaluating HIV/STD interventions in developing countries: do current indicators do justice to advances in intervention approaches?. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2141 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
MacPhail, C, and C Campbell "Evaluating HIV/STD interventions in developing countries: do current indicators do justice to advances in intervention approaches?." (1999) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2141 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
MacPhail C, Campbell C. Evaluating HIV/STD interventions in developing countries: do current indicators do justice to advances in intervention approaches?. 1999; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2141. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - MacPhail, C
AU - Campbell, C
AB - HIV continues to spread unabated in many developing countries. Here the interventions that are currently in place are considered and the methods that are being used to evaluate them as reported in the published literature are critically discussed. In recent years there has been a move away from highly individual-oriented interventions towards more participatory approaches that emphasise techniques such as community-led peer education and group discussions. However, this move towards more community orientated intervention techniques has not been matched by the development of evaluation methods with which to capture and explain the community and social changes which are often necessary preconditions for health-enhancing behaviour change. Evaluation research continues to rely on quantitative methodologies that fail to elucidate the complex changes that the newer interventions seek to promote within target communities. In addition, these methods of evaluation tend to rely on the use of highly individualistic and quantitative biomedical indicators such as HIV/STD rates, or knowledge, attitude, perception and behaviour (KAPB) survey questionnaires. The author argue that such approaches are inadequate for the task of tracking and measuring important determinants of programme success such as psycho-social changes, features of the community-intervention interface and the degree of trust and identification with which members of target communities regard particular interventions. Rigorously conducted qualitative process evaluations taking account of the above factors could make a key contribution to the development of more successful HIV-prevention interventions.
DA - 1999-12
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - HIV infections
KW - Preventive health services
KW - Sexually transmitted diseases
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 1999
SM - 0081-2463
T1 - Evaluating HIV/STD interventions in developing countries: do current indicators do justice to advances in intervention approaches?
TI - Evaluating HIV/STD interventions in developing countries: do current indicators do justice to advances in intervention approaches?
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/2141
ER -
|
en_ZA |