ResearchSpace

Enumeration of fungi in barley

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rabie, CJ en_US
dc.contributor.author Lubben, A en_US
dc.contributor.author Marais, GJ en_US
dc.contributor.author Jansen van Vuuren, H en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-02-06T13:25:38Z en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-06-07T10:07:46Z
dc.date.available 2007-02-06T13:25:38Z en_US
dc.date.available 2007-06-07T10:07:46Z
dc.date.copyright en_US
dc.date.issued 1997-04-01 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Rabie, CJ, et al. 1997. Enumeration of fungi in barley. International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 35(2), pp 117-127 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0168-1605 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1550 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1550
dc.description.abstract Estimation of fungal contamination of barley grain is important as certain fungi can proliferate during the malting process. The following factors which may affect the enumeration of fungi were evaluated: dilution versus direct plating, pre-soaked versus unsoaked grain, five culture media: potato dextrose agar (PDA), acidified Czapek-Dox agar (ACA), pentachloronitrobenzene agar; (PCNB) dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar (DRBC) and malt salt agar; two disinfectants' ethanol/water (80:20 v/v) and sodium hypochlorite (3.5% w/v in H2O). Two barley samples, one having a high incidence of storage fungi and one with a high incidence of field fungi were used and most fungi were identified to species level. Results showed that direct plating was superior to dilution plating for assessing the mycoflora of barley. Unsoaked grain gave significantly higher counts than pre-soaked grain in the case of Alternaria alternata, Rhizopus oryzae, Epicoccum nigrum and Mucor spp. Pre-soaked grain resulted in higher counts of Penicillium spp. Chlorine disinfection resulted in significantly higher counts of Aspergillus flavus, Eurotium spp. and Penicillium spp. Ethanol disinfection resulted in higher counts of Mucor spp., Phoma sorghina, Rhizopus oryzae and Aspergillus restrictus. PDA and ACA, in general gave some what better results than DRBC for both field and storage fungi. PCNB consistently gave the highest Fusarium counts. More than thirty fungal genera were found in the two samples. en_US
dc.format.extent 696102 bytes en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Science BV en_US
dc.rights Copyright: 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. en_US
dc.source en_US
dc.subject Barley en_US
dc.subject Microbiology en_US
dc.subject Fungal contamination en_US
dc.title Enumeration of fungi in barley en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Rabie, C., Lubben, A., Marais, G., & Jansen van Vuuren, H. (1997). Enumeration of fungi in barley. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1550 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Rabie, CJ, A Lubben, GJ Marais, and H Jansen van Vuuren "Enumeration of fungi in barley." (1997) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1550 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Rabie C, Lubben A, Marais G, Jansen van Vuuren H. Enumeration of fungi in barley. 1997; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1550. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Rabie, CJ AU - Lubben, A AU - Marais, GJ AU - Jansen van Vuuren, H AB - Estimation of fungal contamination of barley grain is important as certain fungi can proliferate during the malting process. The following factors which may affect the enumeration of fungi were evaluated: dilution versus direct plating, pre-soaked versus unsoaked grain, five culture media: potato dextrose agar (PDA), acidified Czapek-Dox agar (ACA), pentachloronitrobenzene agar; (PCNB) dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar (DRBC) and malt salt agar; two disinfectants' ethanol/water (80:20 v/v) and sodium hypochlorite (3.5% w/v in H2O). Two barley samples, one having a high incidence of storage fungi and one with a high incidence of field fungi were used and most fungi were identified to species level. Results showed that direct plating was superior to dilution plating for assessing the mycoflora of barley. Unsoaked grain gave significantly higher counts than pre-soaked grain in the case of Alternaria alternata, Rhizopus oryzae, Epicoccum nigrum and Mucor spp. Pre-soaked grain resulted in higher counts of Penicillium spp. Chlorine disinfection resulted in significantly higher counts of Aspergillus flavus, Eurotium spp. and Penicillium spp. Ethanol disinfection resulted in higher counts of Mucor spp., Phoma sorghina, Rhizopus oryzae and Aspergillus restrictus. PDA and ACA, in general gave some what better results than DRBC for both field and storage fungi. PCNB consistently gave the highest Fusarium counts. More than thirty fungal genera were found in the two samples. DA - 1997-04-01 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Barley KW - Microbiology KW - Fungal contamination LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 1997 SM - 0168-1605 T1 - Enumeration of fungi in barley TI - Enumeration of fungi in barley UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/1550 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record