dc.contributor.author |
Otto, A
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Rananga, S
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Masonta, Moshe T
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-09-18T06:11:30Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-09-18T06:11:30Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2024-05 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Otto, A., Rananga, S. & Masonta, M.T. 2024. Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761 . |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.isbn |
978-1-905824-73-1 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
DOI: 10.23919/IST-Africa63983.2024.10569298
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
Radio Frequency (RF) fingerprinting is the theory of identifying a wireless device based on its unique transmitting characteristics. RF fingerprinting uses the validated concept that the physical components and configuration of a transmitting device can result in a distinct wireless emission. This research focuses on the application of machine learning algorithms, specifically Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for the task of RF fingerprinting. The primary aim of this research paper is to comparatively assess the performance of SVMs and CNNs in RF fingerprinting for wireless device identification, focusing on hyperparameters, accuracy and real-world applicability. The study includes an in-depth implementation and evaluation of the SVMs and CNNs models, considering their performance in a high-dimensional dataset of multiple transmissions and wireless devices. While the CNN model slightly outperformed the SVM in terms of classification accuracy, other metrics such as inference time and training duration made the SVM equally competitive. The high accuracy and competitive inference times affirm the real-world applicability of these models, and their need to be further explored. |
en_US |
dc.format |
Fulltext |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.relation.uri |
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10569298 |
en_US |
dc.relation.uri |
http://www.ist-africa.org/Conference2024/default.asp |
en_US |
dc.source |
IST-Africa Conference, Virtual, 20 - 24 May 2024 |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Radio frequency fingerprinting |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Support vector machines |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Convolutional neural networks |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Physical layer security |
en_US |
dc.title |
Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference Presentation |
en_US |
dc.description.pages |
8 |
en_US |
dc.description.note |
Copyright © 2024 The authors |
en_US |
dc.description.cluster |
Next Generation Enterprises & Institutions |
en_US |
dc.description.impactarea |
Spectrum Access Mgmt Innov |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Otto, A., Rananga, S., & Masonta, M. T. (2024). Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Otto, A, S Rananga, and Moshe T Masonta. "Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting." <i>IST-Africa Conference, Virtual, 20 - 24 May 2024</i> (2024): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Otto A, Rananga S, Masonta MT, Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761 . |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Conference Presentation
AU - Otto, A
AU - Rananga, S
AU - Masonta, Moshe T
AB - Radio Frequency (RF) fingerprinting is the theory of identifying a wireless device based on its unique transmitting characteristics. RF fingerprinting uses the validated concept that the physical components and configuration of a transmitting device can result in a distinct wireless emission. This research focuses on the application of machine learning algorithms, specifically Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for the task of RF fingerprinting. The primary aim of this research paper is to comparatively assess the performance of SVMs and CNNs in RF fingerprinting for wireless device identification, focusing on hyperparameters, accuracy and real-world applicability. The study includes an in-depth implementation and evaluation of the SVMs and CNNs models, considering their performance in a high-dimensional dataset of multiple transmissions and wireless devices. While the CNN model slightly outperformed the SVM in terms of classification accuracy, other metrics such as inference time and training duration made the SVM equally competitive. The high accuracy and competitive inference times affirm the real-world applicability of these models, and their need to be further explored.
DA - 2024-05
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
J1 - IST-Africa Conference, Virtual, 20 - 24 May 2024
KW - Radio frequency fingerprinting
KW - Support vector machines
KW - Convolutional neural networks
KW - Physical layer security
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2024
SM - 978-1-905824-73-1
T1 - Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting
TI - Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761
ER -
|
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.worklist |
27893 |
en_US |