ResearchSpace

Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Otto, A
dc.contributor.author Rananga, S
dc.contributor.author Masonta, Moshe T
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-18T06:11:30Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-18T06:11:30Z
dc.date.issued 2024-05
dc.identifier.citation Otto, A., Rananga, S. & Masonta, M.T. 2024. Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-905824-73-1
dc.identifier.uri DOI: 10.23919/IST-Africa63983.2024.10569298
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761
dc.description.abstract Radio Frequency (RF) fingerprinting is the theory of identifying a wireless device based on its unique transmitting characteristics. RF fingerprinting uses the validated concept that the physical components and configuration of a transmitting device can result in a distinct wireless emission. This research focuses on the application of machine learning algorithms, specifically Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for the task of RF fingerprinting. The primary aim of this research paper is to comparatively assess the performance of SVMs and CNNs in RF fingerprinting for wireless device identification, focusing on hyperparameters, accuracy and real-world applicability. The study includes an in-depth implementation and evaluation of the SVMs and CNNs models, considering their performance in a high-dimensional dataset of multiple transmissions and wireless devices. While the CNN model slightly outperformed the SVM in terms of classification accuracy, other metrics such as inference time and training duration made the SVM equally competitive. The high accuracy and competitive inference times affirm the real-world applicability of these models, and their need to be further explored. en_US
dc.format Fulltext en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.uri https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10569298 en_US
dc.relation.uri http://www.ist-africa.org/Conference2024/default.asp en_US
dc.source IST-Africa Conference, Virtual, 20 - 24 May 2024 en_US
dc.subject Radio frequency fingerprinting en_US
dc.subject Support vector machines en_US
dc.subject Convolutional neural networks en_US
dc.subject Physical layer security en_US
dc.title Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.description.pages 8 en_US
dc.description.note Copyright © 2024 The authors en_US
dc.description.cluster Next Generation Enterprises & Institutions en_US
dc.description.impactarea Spectrum Access Mgmt Innov en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Otto, A., Rananga, S., & Masonta, M. T. (2024). Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Otto, A, S Rananga, and Moshe T Masonta. "Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting." <i>IST-Africa Conference, Virtual, 20 - 24 May 2024</i> (2024): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Otto A, Rananga S, Masonta MT, Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Otto, A AU - Rananga, S AU - Masonta, Moshe T AB - Radio Frequency (RF) fingerprinting is the theory of identifying a wireless device based on its unique transmitting characteristics. RF fingerprinting uses the validated concept that the physical components and configuration of a transmitting device can result in a distinct wireless emission. This research focuses on the application of machine learning algorithms, specifically Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for the task of RF fingerprinting. The primary aim of this research paper is to comparatively assess the performance of SVMs and CNNs in RF fingerprinting for wireless device identification, focusing on hyperparameters, accuracy and real-world applicability. The study includes an in-depth implementation and evaluation of the SVMs and CNNs models, considering their performance in a high-dimensional dataset of multiple transmissions and wireless devices. While the CNN model slightly outperformed the SVM in terms of classification accuracy, other metrics such as inference time and training duration made the SVM equally competitive. The high accuracy and competitive inference times affirm the real-world applicability of these models, and their need to be further explored. DA - 2024-05 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR J1 - IST-Africa Conference, Virtual, 20 - 24 May 2024 KW - Radio frequency fingerprinting KW - Support vector machines KW - Convolutional neural networks KW - Physical layer security LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2024 SM - 978-1-905824-73-1 T1 - Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting TI - Deep learning vs. traditional learning for radio frequency fingerprinting UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/13761 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 27893 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record