ResearchSpace

Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Henrico, S
dc.contributor.author Coetzee, S
dc.contributor.author Cooper, Antony K
dc.date.accessioned 2023-06-13T10:34:24Z
dc.date.available 2023-06-13T10:34:24Z
dc.date.issued 2022-11
dc.identifier.citation Henrico, S., Coetzee, S. & Cooper, A.K. 2022. Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa. <i>Transactions in GIS.</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792 en_ZA
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13003
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792
dc.description.abstract We conducted a study to find out whether and why South African users accepted QGIS. In the quantitative part of the study, we found that QGIS acceptance is primarily influenced by habit, followed by facilitating conditions, price value, and social influence. To better understand and explain these results, we conducted a qualitative study in which semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 geospatial practitioners. While a geographic information system (GIS) product was often prescribed by their workplace, interviewees had clear preferences for a specific GIS product for certain kinds of tasks, supporting the finding that habit is the main reason for using a GIS product. Interviewees used QGIS because it opens most data formats and there is one license for all functionality (facilitating conditions), is free (price value), and/or had been advised by someone important (social influence). The interviews revealed why software support (commercial or free) was not significant in the quantitative results: users think GIS support is not necessary or else available online. Identical to the quantitative study, interviews confirmed that customizability, no vendor lock-in, improved reliability, quality, and security do not play a role when deciding to use QGIS. These qualitative results provide a deeper understanding of the quantitative results and can be used by promotors of open-source geospatial software to increase uptake. In general, they can also help managers embed new products into any organization's workflows. In our study, interviewees and questionnaire respondents were selected to be users. Repeating the study for GIS developers and/or managers will provide further insight into QGIS acceptance. en_US
dc.format Fulltext en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.uri https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tgis.13003 en_US
dc.source Transactions in GIS en_US
dc.subject Free and open-source software en_US
dc.subject Geographical information system en_US
dc.subject GIS en_US
dc.subject Free and open-source software for geographical information systems en_US
dc.subject FOSSGIS en_US
dc.subject Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology en_US
dc.subject UTAUT2 en_US
dc.subject QGIS en_US
dc.title Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.pages 20 en_US
dc.description.note © 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. en_US
dc.description.cluster Smart Places en_US
dc.description.impactarea Housing and Urban Studies en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Henrico, S., Coetzee, S., & Cooper, A. K. (2022). Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa. <i>Transactions in GIS</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Henrico, S, S Coetzee, and Antony K Cooper "Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa." <i>Transactions in GIS</i> (2022) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Henrico S, Coetzee S, Cooper AK. Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa. Transactions in GIS. 2022; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Henrico, S AU - Coetzee, S AU - Cooper, Antony K AB - We conducted a study to find out whether and why South African users accepted QGIS. In the quantitative part of the study, we found that QGIS acceptance is primarily influenced by habit, followed by facilitating conditions, price value, and social influence. To better understand and explain these results, we conducted a qualitative study in which semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 geospatial practitioners. While a geographic information system (GIS) product was often prescribed by their workplace, interviewees had clear preferences for a specific GIS product for certain kinds of tasks, supporting the finding that habit is the main reason for using a GIS product. Interviewees used QGIS because it opens most data formats and there is one license for all functionality (facilitating conditions), is free (price value), and/or had been advised by someone important (social influence). The interviews revealed why software support (commercial or free) was not significant in the quantitative results: users think GIS support is not necessary or else available online. Identical to the quantitative study, interviews confirmed that customizability, no vendor lock-in, improved reliability, quality, and security do not play a role when deciding to use QGIS. These qualitative results provide a deeper understanding of the quantitative results and can be used by promotors of open-source geospatial software to increase uptake. In general, they can also help managers embed new products into any organization's workflows. In our study, interviewees and questionnaire respondents were selected to be users. Repeating the study for GIS developers and/or managers will provide further insight into QGIS acceptance. DA - 2022-11 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR J1 - Transactions in GIS KW - Free and open-source software KW - Geographical information system KW - GIS KW - Free and open-source software for geographical information systems KW - FOSSGIS KW - Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology KW - UTAUT2 KW - QGIS LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2022 T1 - Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa TI - Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 26348 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record