dc.contributor.author |
Henrico, S
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Coetzee, S
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Cooper, Antony K
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-06-13T10:34:24Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-06-13T10:34:24Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022-11 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Henrico, S., Coetzee, S. & Cooper, A.K. 2022. Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa. <i>Transactions in GIS.</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13003
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
We conducted a study to find out whether and why South African users accepted QGIS. In the quantitative part of the study, we found that QGIS acceptance is primarily influenced by habit, followed by facilitating conditions, price value, and social influence. To better understand and explain these results, we conducted a qualitative study in which semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 geospatial practitioners. While a geographic information system (GIS) product was often prescribed by their workplace, interviewees had clear preferences for a specific GIS product for certain kinds of tasks, supporting the finding that habit is the main reason for using a GIS product. Interviewees used QGIS because it opens most data formats and there is one license for all functionality (facilitating conditions), is free (price value), and/or had been advised by someone important (social influence). The interviews revealed why software support (commercial or free) was not significant in the quantitative results: users think GIS support is not necessary or else available online. Identical to the quantitative study, interviews confirmed that customizability, no vendor lock-in, improved reliability, quality, and security do not play a role when deciding to use QGIS. These qualitative results provide a deeper understanding of the quantitative results and can be used by promotors of open-source geospatial software to increase uptake. In general, they can also help managers embed new products into any organization's workflows. In our study, interviewees and questionnaire respondents were selected to be users. Repeating the study for GIS developers and/or managers will provide further insight into QGIS acceptance. |
en_US |
dc.format |
Fulltext |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.relation.uri |
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tgis.13003 |
en_US |
dc.source |
Transactions in GIS |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Free and open-source software |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Geographical information system |
en_US |
dc.subject |
GIS |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Free and open-source software for geographical information systems |
en_US |
dc.subject |
FOSSGIS |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
UTAUT2 |
en_US |
dc.subject |
QGIS |
en_US |
dc.title |
Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.description.pages |
20 |
en_US |
dc.description.note |
© 2022 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
en_US |
dc.description.cluster |
Smart Places |
en_US |
dc.description.impactarea |
Housing and Urban Studies |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Henrico, S., Coetzee, S., & Cooper, A. K. (2022). Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa. <i>Transactions in GIS</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Henrico, S, S Coetzee, and Antony K Cooper "Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa." <i>Transactions in GIS</i> (2022) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Henrico S, Coetzee S, Cooper AK. Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa. Transactions in GIS. 2022; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - Henrico, S
AU - Coetzee, S
AU - Cooper, Antony K
AB - We conducted a study to find out whether and why South African users accepted QGIS. In the quantitative part of the study, we found that QGIS acceptance is primarily influenced by habit, followed by facilitating conditions, price value, and social influence. To better understand and explain these results, we conducted a qualitative study in which semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 geospatial practitioners. While a geographic information system (GIS) product was often prescribed by their workplace, interviewees had clear preferences for a specific GIS product for certain kinds of tasks, supporting the finding that habit is the main reason for using a GIS product. Interviewees used QGIS because it opens most data formats and there is one license for all functionality (facilitating conditions), is free (price value), and/or had been advised by someone important (social influence). The interviews revealed why software support (commercial or free) was not significant in the quantitative results: users think GIS support is not necessary or else available online. Identical to the quantitative study, interviews confirmed that customizability, no vendor lock-in, improved reliability, quality, and security do not play a role when deciding to use QGIS. These qualitative results provide a deeper understanding of the quantitative results and can be used by promotors of open-source geospatial software to increase uptake. In general, they can also help managers embed new products into any organization's workflows. In our study, interviewees and questionnaire respondents were selected to be users. Repeating the study for GIS developers and/or managers will provide further insight into QGIS acceptance.
DA - 2022-11
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
J1 - Transactions in GIS
KW - Free and open-source software
KW - Geographical information system
KW - GIS
KW - Free and open-source software for geographical information systems
KW - FOSSGIS
KW - Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
KW - UTAUT2
KW - QGIS
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2022
T1 - Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa
TI - Qualitative insights into the acceptance of QGIS in South Africa
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12792
ER -
|
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.worklist |
26348 |
en_US |