ResearchSpace

Incorporating free-flowing rivers into global biodiversity targets: Prioritization and targeted interventions to maintain ecological integrity

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Petersen, CR
dc.contributor.author Van Deventer, Heidi
dc.contributor.author Smith-Adao, Lindie B
dc.contributor.author Nel, JL
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-26T07:53:10Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-26T07:53:10Z
dc.date.issued 2022-12
dc.identifier.citation Petersen, C., Van Deventer, H., Smith-Adao, L. & Nel, J. 2022. Incorporating free-flowing rivers into global biodiversity targets: Prioritization and targeted interventions to maintain ecological integrity. <i>Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12608 en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1052-7613
dc.identifier.issn 1099-0755
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3898
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12608
dc.description.abstract Free-flowing rivers (FFRs) are important surrogates for freshwater biodiversity as there are increasingly fewer rivers that reflect intact habitat and species diversity from source to sea. The status and changes in the ecological condition or protection of FFRs is not explicitly reported on in global biodiversity targets. Indices are proposed for reporting such changes to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 6 and 15, Aichi Target 11, and the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. FFRs were identified at a countrywide scale in South Africa for protection, planning, monitoring, and assessing changes in their ecological condition and protection status. They were selected and prioritized using criteria co-produced with national, provincial, and local river managers and policy makers. Given the high competition for water resources and the unlikely possibility for strictly protecting all FFRs, a subset of FFRs, termed ‘flagship FFRs’, was identified. Methods for reporting changes in the protection levels of prioritized FFRs at a countrywide scale were developed, which included indices of FFRs related to global targets: the loss of the extent of FFRs in a natural and largely natural ecological condition for SDG 6; changes in the connectivity of FFRs included in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework targets; and changes in protection levels of FFRs for Aichi Target 11 and SDG 15.1.2. Flagship FFRs attracted targeted management initiatives and thus maintained their connectivity and ecological condition. This was not true when all FFRs were considered; in the broader set of FFRs, longitudinal fragmentation increased and ecological condition declined from 2011 to 2018.Considering the increasing pressures rivers are likely to experience from human and climate change impacts, particularly in semi-arid to temperate environments, urgent prioritization and monitoring of FFRs is called for so that a targeted set of protection and management strategies can be applied. en_US
dc.format Abstract en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.uri https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/aqc.3898 en_US
dc.source Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems en_US
dc.subject Aichi Target 11 en_US
dc.subject Ecological condition en_US
dc.subject Freshwater ecosystems en_US
dc.subject Post-2020 global biodiversity framework en_US
dc.subject River fragmentation en_US
dc.subject Sustainable development goals en_US
dc.title Incorporating free-flowing rivers into global biodiversity targets: Prioritization and targeted interventions to maintain ecological integrity en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.pages 4 en_US
dc.description.note © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/aqc.3898 en_US
dc.description.cluster Smart Places en_US
dc.description.impactarea Coastal Systems en_US
dc.description.impactarea Biodiversity & Ecosystem Services en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Petersen, C., Van Deventer, H., Smith-Adao, L., & Nel, J. (2022). Incorporating free-flowing rivers into global biodiversity targets: Prioritization and targeted interventions to maintain ecological integrity. <i>Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12608 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Petersen, CR, Heidi Van Deventer, Lindie Smith-Adao, and JL Nel "Incorporating free-flowing rivers into global biodiversity targets: Prioritization and targeted interventions to maintain ecological integrity." <i>Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems</i> (2022) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12608 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Petersen C, Van Deventer H, Smith-Adao L, Nel J. Incorporating free-flowing rivers into global biodiversity targets: Prioritization and targeted interventions to maintain ecological integrity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 2022; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12608. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Petersen, CR AU - Van Deventer, Heidi AU - Smith-Adao, Lindie AU - Nel, JL AB - Free-flowing rivers (FFRs) are important surrogates for freshwater biodiversity as there are increasingly fewer rivers that reflect intact habitat and species diversity from source to sea. The status and changes in the ecological condition or protection of FFRs is not explicitly reported on in global biodiversity targets. Indices are proposed for reporting such changes to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 6 and 15, Aichi Target 11, and the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. FFRs were identified at a countrywide scale in South Africa for protection, planning, monitoring, and assessing changes in their ecological condition and protection status. They were selected and prioritized using criteria co-produced with national, provincial, and local river managers and policy makers. Given the high competition for water resources and the unlikely possibility for strictly protecting all FFRs, a subset of FFRs, termed ‘flagship FFRs’, was identified. Methods for reporting changes in the protection levels of prioritized FFRs at a countrywide scale were developed, which included indices of FFRs related to global targets: the loss of the extent of FFRs in a natural and largely natural ecological condition for SDG 6; changes in the connectivity of FFRs included in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework targets; and changes in protection levels of FFRs for Aichi Target 11 and SDG 15.1.2. Flagship FFRs attracted targeted management initiatives and thus maintained their connectivity and ecological condition. This was not true when all FFRs were considered; in the broader set of FFRs, longitudinal fragmentation increased and ecological condition declined from 2011 to 2018.Considering the increasing pressures rivers are likely to experience from human and climate change impacts, particularly in semi-arid to temperate environments, urgent prioritization and monitoring of FFRs is called for so that a targeted set of protection and management strategies can be applied. DA - 2022-12 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR J1 - Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems KW - Aichi Target 11 KW - Ecological condition KW - Freshwater ecosystems KW - Post-2020 global biodiversity framework KW - River fragmentation KW - Sustainable development goals LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2022 SM - 1052-7613 SM - 1099-0755 T1 - Incorporating free-flowing rivers into global biodiversity targets: Prioritization and targeted interventions to maintain ecological integrity TI - Incorporating free-flowing rivers into global biodiversity targets: Prioritization and targeted interventions to maintain ecological integrity UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12608 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 26430 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record