dc.contributor.author |
Funke, Nicola S
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Huitema, D
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Petersen, A
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-03T08:24:15Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-03T08:24:15Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022-06 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Funke, N., Huitema, D. & Petersen, A. 2022. Impending doom or unnecessary panic? The struggle for discursive hegemony in South Africa’s acid mine drainage policy problem. <i>Critical Policy Studies.</i> http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12600 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
1946-0171 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1946-018X |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2092523
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12600
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
This article contributes to the literature on environmental policy controversies. We utilize an Argumentative Discourse Analysis (ADA)-based approachto analyze the struggle for discursive hegemony that took place between competing story-lines in the context of the acid mine drainage (AMD) environmental policy problem, located in the gold mining areas of greater Johannesburg, South Africa. With this article we make a theoretical contribution by presenting and applying an adapted ADA framework strongly focused on the operationalization of key ADA concepts. Our empirical contribution lies in providing a rich and deep analysis of an environmental policy controversy that has not yet been studied from an ADA perspective. In particular, we demonstrate and discuss the complex path to discourse institutionalization followed by the dominant emergent AMD story-line. In conclusion , we recommend steps for updating the ADA approach and developing an accompanying set of guidelines to further enable the operationalization of its concepts. |
en_US |
dc.format |
Fulltext |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.relation.uri |
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19460171.2022.2092523 |
en_US |
dc.source |
Critical Policy Studies |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Argumentative discourse analysis |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Story-lines |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Discursive hegemony |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Acid mine drainage |
en_US |
dc.title |
Impending doom or unnecessary panic? The struggle for discursive hegemony in South Africa’s acid mine drainage policy problem |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.description.pages |
21 |
en_US |
dc.description.note |
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
en_US |
dc.description.cluster |
Smart Places |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Funke, N., Huitema, D., & Petersen, A. (2022). Impending doom or unnecessary panic? The struggle for discursive hegemony in South Africa’s acid mine drainage policy problem. <i>Critical Policy Studies</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12600 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Funke, Nikki, D Huitema, and A Petersen "Impending doom or unnecessary panic? The struggle for discursive hegemony in South Africa’s acid mine drainage policy problem." <i>Critical Policy Studies</i> (2022) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12600 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Funke N, Huitema D, Petersen A. Impending doom or unnecessary panic? The struggle for discursive hegemony in South Africa’s acid mine drainage policy problem. Critical Policy Studies. 2022; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12600. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - Funke, Nikki
AU - Huitema, D
AU - Petersen, A
AB - This article contributes to the literature on environmental policy controversies. We utilize an Argumentative Discourse Analysis (ADA)-based approachto analyze the struggle for discursive hegemony that took place between competing story-lines in the context of the acid mine drainage (AMD) environmental policy problem, located in the gold mining areas of greater Johannesburg, South Africa. With this article we make a theoretical contribution by presenting and applying an adapted ADA framework strongly focused on the operationalization of key ADA concepts. Our empirical contribution lies in providing a rich and deep analysis of an environmental policy controversy that has not yet been studied from an ADA perspective. In particular, we demonstrate and discuss the complex path to discourse institutionalization followed by the dominant emergent AMD story-line. In conclusion , we recommend steps for updating the ADA approach and developing an accompanying set of guidelines to further enable the operationalization of its concepts.
DA - 2022-06
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
J1 - Critical Policy Studies
KW - Argumentative discourse analysis
KW - Story-lines
KW - Discursive hegemony
KW - Acid mine drainage
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2022
SM - 1946-0171
SM - 1946-018X
T1 - Impending doom or unnecessary panic? The struggle for discursive hegemony in South Africa’s acid mine drainage policy problem
TI - Impending doom or unnecessary panic? The struggle for discursive hegemony in South Africa’s acid mine drainage policy problem
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12600
ER - |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.worklist |
26349 |
en_US |