ResearchSpace

A QoS-based evaluation of SDN controllers: ONOS and OpenDayLight

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mamushiane, Lusani
dc.contributor.author Shozi, Themba C
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-16T07:05:49Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-16T07:05:49Z
dc.date.issued 2021-05
dc.identifier.citation Mamushiane, L. & Shozi, T.C. 2021. A QoS-based evaluation of SDN controllers: ONOS and OpenDayLight. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12149 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-905824-67-0
dc.identifier.issn 2576-8581
dc.identifier.issn 2576-859X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12149
dc.description.abstract SDN marks a paradigm shift towards an externalized and logically centralized controller, unlike the legacy networks where control and data planes are tightly coupled. The controller has a comprehensive view of the network, offering flexibility to enforce new traffic engineering policies and easing automation. In SDN, a high performance controller is required for efficient traffic management. In this paper, we conduct a performance evaluation of two distributed SDN controllers, namely ONOS and OpenDayLight. Specifically, we use the Mininet emulation environment to emulate different topologies and the D-ITG traffic generator to evaluate aforementioned controllers based on metrics such as delay, jitter and packet loss. The experimental results show that ONOS provides a significantly higher latency, jitter and low packet loss than OpenDayLight in all topologies. We attribute the poor performance of OpenDayLight to its excessive CPU utilization and propose the use of Hyper-threading to improve its performance. This work provides practitioners in the telecoms industry with guidelines towards making informed controller selection decisions. en_US
dc.format Fulltext en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.uri https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9577034 en_US
dc.relation.uri https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9577034 en_US
dc.source IST-Africa 2021 Conference Proceedings, Virtual Conference, 10-14 May 2021 en_US
dc.subject Distributed controllers en_US
dc.subject D-ITG en_US
dc.subject Jitter en_US
dc.subject Mininet en_US
dc.subject Open Network Operating System en_US
dc.subject ONOS en_US
dc.subject OpenDayLight en_US
dc.subject Packet loss en_US
dc.subject Software Defined Networking en_US
dc.subject SDN en_US
dc.title A QoS-based evaluation of SDN controllers: ONOS and OpenDayLight en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.description.pages 10 en_US
dc.description.note Copyright © 2021 The authors en_US
dc.description.cluster Next Generation Enterprises & Institutions en_US
dc.description.cluster Smart Mobility en_US
dc.description.impactarea Cloud & Network Architectures en_US
dc.description.impactarea Trans Network Asset Man Sys en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Mamushiane, L., & Shozi, T. C. (2021). A QoS-based evaluation of SDN controllers: ONOS and OpenDayLight. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12149 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Mamushiane, Lusani, and Themba C Shozi. "A QoS-based evaluation of SDN controllers: ONOS and OpenDayLight." <i>IST-Africa 2021 Conference Proceedings, Virtual Conference, 10-14 May 2021</i> (2021): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12149 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Mamushiane L, Shozi TC, A QoS-based evaluation of SDN controllers: ONOS and OpenDayLight; 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12149 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Mamushiane, Lusani AU - Shozi, Themba C AB - SDN marks a paradigm shift towards an externalized and logically centralized controller, unlike the legacy networks where control and data planes are tightly coupled. The controller has a comprehensive view of the network, offering flexibility to enforce new traffic engineering policies and easing automation. In SDN, a high performance controller is required for efficient traffic management. In this paper, we conduct a performance evaluation of two distributed SDN controllers, namely ONOS and OpenDayLight. Specifically, we use the Mininet emulation environment to emulate different topologies and the D-ITG traffic generator to evaluate aforementioned controllers based on metrics such as delay, jitter and packet loss. The experimental results show that ONOS provides a significantly higher latency, jitter and low packet loss than OpenDayLight in all topologies. We attribute the poor performance of OpenDayLight to its excessive CPU utilization and propose the use of Hyper-threading to improve its performance. This work provides practitioners in the telecoms industry with guidelines towards making informed controller selection decisions. DA - 2021-05 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR J1 - IST-Africa 2021 Conference Proceedings, Virtual Conference, 10-14 May 2021 KW - Distributed controllers KW - D-ITG KW - Jitter KW - Mininet KW - Open Network Operating System KW - ONOS KW - OpenDayLight KW - Packet loss KW - Software Defined Networking KW - SDN LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2021 SM - 978-1-905824-67-0 SM - 2576-8581 SM - 2576-859X T1 - A QoS-based evaluation of SDN controllers: ONOS and OpenDayLight TI - A QoS-based evaluation of SDN controllers: ONOS and OpenDayLight UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/12149 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.worklist 25060 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record