ResearchSpace

Land use land cover change and the comparative impact of co-management and government-management on the forest cover in Malawi (1999-2018)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Goede, MF
dc.contributor.author Cho, Moses A
dc.contributor.author Chirwa, W
dc.contributor.author Geldenhuys, CJ
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-01T10:42:49Z
dc.date.available 2020-12-01T10:42:49Z
dc.date.issued 2020-01
dc.identifier.citation Geode, M.F. et al. 2020. Land use land cover change and the comparative impact of co-management and government-management on the forest cover in Malawi (1999-2018). Journal of Land Use Science, vol. 14(4-6): 281-305 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1747-423X
dc.identifier.issn 1747-4248
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2019.1706654
dc.identifier.uri https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1747423X.2019.1706654
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11681
dc.description Copyright: 2020 Taylor & Francis. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website. The definitive version of the work is published in Journal of Land Use Science, vol. 14(4-6): 281-305 en_US
dc.description.abstract Miombo Woodland is the major Land use/land cover with important ecological functions in Africa. In Malawi, government-management was designed to manage Woodlands. However, when illegal activities continued, Participatory Forest Management (co-management) in forest reserves was institutionalised for woodland sustainability. Currently, information on co-management mitigating deforestation and degradation is scant. This study assessed woodland/forest through Land use/land cover (LULC) classification across the country (Malawi); compared forest cover within and between strategies using 11 co-management and 12 government-management forest reserves across the country between 1999 and 2018. Overall accuracies were >90%. Woodland net loses 8.4% (4.39–3.39 million ha) were to Plantation, Grassland and Agriculture transition intensities. Agriculture net gains 9.6% (1.87–3.00 million ha) were from Grassland, Settlement and Woodland transitions for the whole Malawi. Forest cover within co-management and government-management indicated loses. Sustainable management of degraded woodlands, integrated Agriculture and monitoring is encouraged. Further interpretation of transitions is recommended. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;23731
dc.subject Co-management en_US
dc.subject Forest cover en_US
dc.subject Government management en_US
dc.subject Land cover en_US
dc.subject Land use en_US
dc.subject Malawi en_US
dc.subject Miombo Woodlands en_US
dc.title Land use land cover change and the comparative impact of co-management and government-management on the forest cover in Malawi (1999-2018) en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Goede, M., Cho, M. A., Chirwa, W., & Geldenhuys, C. (2020). Land use land cover change and the comparative impact of co-management and government-management on the forest cover in Malawi (1999-2018). http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11681 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Goede, MF, Moses A Cho, W Chirwa, and CJ Geldenhuys "Land use land cover change and the comparative impact of co-management and government-management on the forest cover in Malawi (1999-2018)." (2020) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11681 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Goede M, Cho MA, Chirwa W, Geldenhuys C. Land use land cover change and the comparative impact of co-management and government-management on the forest cover in Malawi (1999-2018). 2020; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11681. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Goede, MF AU - Cho, Moses A AU - Chirwa, W AU - Geldenhuys, CJ AB - Miombo Woodland is the major Land use/land cover with important ecological functions in Africa. In Malawi, government-management was designed to manage Woodlands. However, when illegal activities continued, Participatory Forest Management (co-management) in forest reserves was institutionalised for woodland sustainability. Currently, information on co-management mitigating deforestation and degradation is scant. This study assessed woodland/forest through Land use/land cover (LULC) classification across the country (Malawi); compared forest cover within and between strategies using 11 co-management and 12 government-management forest reserves across the country between 1999 and 2018. Overall accuracies were >90%. Woodland net loses 8.4% (4.39–3.39 million ha) were to Plantation, Grassland and Agriculture transition intensities. Agriculture net gains 9.6% (1.87–3.00 million ha) were from Grassland, Settlement and Woodland transitions for the whole Malawi. Forest cover within co-management and government-management indicated loses. Sustainable management of degraded woodlands, integrated Agriculture and monitoring is encouraged. Further interpretation of transitions is recommended. DA - 2020-01 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Co-management KW - Forest cover KW - Government management KW - Land cover KW - Land use KW - Malawi KW - Miombo Woodlands LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2020 SM - 1747-423X SM - 1747-4248 T1 - Land use land cover change and the comparative impact of co-management and government-management on the forest cover in Malawi (1999-2018) TI - Land use land cover change and the comparative impact of co-management and government-management on the forest cover in Malawi (1999-2018) UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11681 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record