ResearchSpace

Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author García, CL
dc.contributor.author Jovanovic, Nebojsa
dc.contributor.author Teich, I
dc.contributor.author Fink, M
dc.contributor.author Dzikiti, Sebinasi
dc.contributor.author Bugan, Richard DH
dc.date.accessioned 2020-08-24T10:20:23Z
dc.date.available 2020-08-24T10:20:23Z
dc.date.issued 2020-04
dc.identifier.citation Bugan, R.D.H. (et.al.). 2020. Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches. Water SA, v46(2), 158-170 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0378-4738
dc.identifier.issn 1816-7950
dc.identifier.uri DOI: 10.17159/wsa/2020.v46.i2.8231
dc.identifier.uri https://www.ajol.info/index.php/wsa/article/view/195935
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11555
dc.description Copyright: 2020 Water Research Commission. This is the full text version of the work. en_US
dc.description.abstract Reliable spatial data of evapotranspiration (ET) in support of water resources management are limited. ET is a major component of the water balance, in many regions, and therefore it is critical that it be accurately quantified. To identify a product that accurately estimates spatially distributed ET for application in data-scarce regions, an inter-model comparison was conducted between the MOD16 ET dataset and the ET calculated with the calibrated and validated JAMS/J2000 hydrological model in the Sandspruit catchment (South Africa). Annual JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET data were generally consistent. Monthly JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET dynamics are influenced by the response of vegetation to precipitation as well as the atmospheric evaporative demand. The maximum correlation coefficient between JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET was 0.82 and it was evident at Lag 0, showing that both ET estimates are in phase when evaluated at the basin scale. The maximum correlation coefficients between the ET estimators and precipitation were 0.67 and 0.70 for JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET, respectively, and this was evident at Lag 2 (1 lag is 1 month) for both methods. This suggests that there is a 2-month delay in the maximum response of ET to precipitation. The models did not exhibit significant dependence on the seasonal distribution of precipitation. The complementary use of hydrological modelling and satellite-derived data may be greatly advantageous to water resources management, e.g., water allocation studies, ecological reserve determinations and vegetation water use studies. The results of the inter-model comparison also provide motivation for the use of the MOD16 ET dataset to estimate ET in data-scarce regions. Additionally, this study provides evidence for the potential use of validated satellite-based ET data as inputs in hydrological models. This may facilitate a more realistic representation of the catchment hydrological processes. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Water Research Commission en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;23662
dc.subject Evapotranspiration en_US
dc.subject Hydrological modelling en_US
dc.subject Remote sensing en_US
dc.title Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation García, C., Jovanovic, N., Teich, I., Fink, M., Dzikiti, S., & Bugan, R. D. (2020). Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11555 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation García, CL, Nebojsa Jovanovic, I Teich, M Fink, Sebinasi Dzikiti, and Richard DH Bugan "Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches." (2020) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11555 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation García C, Jovanovic N, Teich I, Fink M, Dzikiti S, Bugan RD. Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches. 2020; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11555. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - García, CL AU - Jovanovic, Nebojsa AU - Teich, I AU - Fink, M AU - Dzikiti, Sebinasi AU - Bugan, Richard DH AB - Reliable spatial data of evapotranspiration (ET) in support of water resources management are limited. ET is a major component of the water balance, in many regions, and therefore it is critical that it be accurately quantified. To identify a product that accurately estimates spatially distributed ET for application in data-scarce regions, an inter-model comparison was conducted between the MOD16 ET dataset and the ET calculated with the calibrated and validated JAMS/J2000 hydrological model in the Sandspruit catchment (South Africa). Annual JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET data were generally consistent. Monthly JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET dynamics are influenced by the response of vegetation to precipitation as well as the atmospheric evaporative demand. The maximum correlation coefficient between JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET was 0.82 and it was evident at Lag 0, showing that both ET estimates are in phase when evaluated at the basin scale. The maximum correlation coefficients between the ET estimators and precipitation were 0.67 and 0.70 for JAMS-ET and MOD16-ET, respectively, and this was evident at Lag 2 (1 lag is 1 month) for both methods. This suggests that there is a 2-month delay in the maximum response of ET to precipitation. The models did not exhibit significant dependence on the seasonal distribution of precipitation. The complementary use of hydrological modelling and satellite-derived data may be greatly advantageous to water resources management, e.g., water allocation studies, ecological reserve determinations and vegetation water use studies. The results of the inter-model comparison also provide motivation for the use of the MOD16 ET dataset to estimate ET in data-scarce regions. Additionally, this study provides evidence for the potential use of validated satellite-based ET data as inputs in hydrological models. This may facilitate a more realistic representation of the catchment hydrological processes. DA - 2020-04 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Evapotranspiration KW - Hydrological modelling KW - Remote sensing LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2020 SM - 0378-4738 SM - 1816-7950 T1 - Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches TI - Estimating evapotranspiration in a semi-arid catchment: A comparison of hydrological modelling and remote-sensing approaches UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11555 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record