ResearchSpace

Comparison of two remote sensing models for estimating evapotranspiration: algorithm evaluation and application in seasonally arid ecosystems in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dzikiti, Sebinasi
dc.contributor.author Jovanovic, Nebojsa
dc.contributor.author Bugan, Richard DH
dc.contributor.author Ramoelo, Abel
dc.contributor.author Majozi, Nobuhle P
dc.contributor.author Nickless, Alecia
dc.contributor.author Cho, Moses A
dc.contributor.author Le Maitre, David C
dc.contributor.author Ntshidi, Zanele
dc.contributor.author Pienaar, Harrison H
dc.date.accessioned 2020-04-12T18:52:43Z
dc.date.available 2020-04-12T18:52:43Z
dc.date.issued 2019-09
dc.identifier.citation Dzikiti, S. et al. 2019. Comparison of two remote sensing models for estimating evapotranspiration: algorithm evaluation and application in seasonally arid ecosystems in South Africa. Journal of Arid Land, vol. 11(4): 495-512 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1674-6767
dc.identifier.issn 2194-7783
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-019-0098-2
dc.identifier.uri http://jal.xjegi.com/EN/10.1007/s40333-019-0098-2
dc.identifier.uri https://rdcu.be/b3bvk
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11413
dc.description © Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full text item. For access to the full text item, please consult the publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-019-0098-2. A free fulltext non-print version of the article can be viewed at https://rdcu.be/b3bvk en_US
dc.description.abstract Remote sensing tools are becoming increasingly important for providing spatial information on water use by different ecosystems. Despite significant advances in remote sensing based evapotranspiration (ET) models in recent years, important information gaps still exist on the accuracy of the models particularly in arid and semi-arid environments. In this study, we evaluated the Penman-Monteith based MOD16 and the modified Priestley-Taylor (PT-JPL) models at the daily time step against three measured ET datasets. We used data from two summer and one winter rainfall sites in South Africa. One site was dominated by native broad leaf and the other by fine leafed deciduous savanna tree species and C4 grasses. The third site was in the winter rainfall Cape region and had shrubby fynbos vegetation. Actual ET was measured using open-path eddy covariance systems at the summer rainfall sites while a surface energy balance system utilizing the large aperture boundary layer scintillometer was used in the Cape. Model performance varied between sites and between years with the worst estimates (R2<0.50 and RMSE>0.80 mm/d) observed during years with prolonged mid-summer dry spells in the summer rainfall areas. Sensitivity tests on MOD16 showed that the leaf area index, surface conductance and radiation budget parameters had the largest effect on simulated ET. MOD16 ET predictions were improved by: (1) reformulating the emissivity expressions in the net radiation equation; (2) incorporating representative surface conductance values; and (3) including a soil moisture stress function in the transpiration sub-model. Implementing these changes increased the accuracy of MOD16 daily ET predictions at all sites. However, similar adjustments to the PT-JPL model yielded minimal improvements. We conclude that the MOD16 ET model has the potential to accurately predict water use in arid environments provided soil water stress and accurate biome-specific parameters are incorporated. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer; Science Press en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;23396
dc.subject MOD16 ET en_US
dc.subject Drought stress en_US
dc.subject Model validation en_US
dc.subject Penman-Monteith en_US
dc.subject Priestley-Taylor en_US
dc.subject Sensitivity analysis en_US
dc.title Comparison of two remote sensing models for estimating evapotranspiration: algorithm evaluation and application in seasonally arid ecosystems in South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Dzikiti, S., Jovanovic, N., Bugan, R. D., Ramoelo, A., Majozi, N. P., Nickless, A., ... Pienaar, H. H. (2019). Comparison of two remote sensing models for estimating evapotranspiration: algorithm evaluation and application in seasonally arid ecosystems in South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11413 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Dzikiti, Sebinasi, Nebojsa Jovanovic, Richard DH Bugan, Abel Ramoelo, Nobuhle P Majozi, Alecia Nickless, Moses A Cho, David C Le Maitre, Zanele Ntshidi, and Harrison H Pienaar "Comparison of two remote sensing models for estimating evapotranspiration: algorithm evaluation and application in seasonally arid ecosystems in South Africa." (2019) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11413 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Dzikiti S, Jovanovic N, Bugan RD, Ramoelo A, Majozi NP, Nickless A, et al. Comparison of two remote sensing models for estimating evapotranspiration: algorithm evaluation and application in seasonally arid ecosystems in South Africa. 2019; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11413. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Dzikiti, Sebinasi AU - Jovanovic, Nebojsa AU - Bugan, Richard DH AU - Ramoelo, Abel AU - Majozi, Nobuhle P AU - Nickless, Alecia AU - Cho, Moses A AU - Le Maitre, David C AU - Ntshidi, Zanele AU - Pienaar, Harrison H AB - Remote sensing tools are becoming increasingly important for providing spatial information on water use by different ecosystems. Despite significant advances in remote sensing based evapotranspiration (ET) models in recent years, important information gaps still exist on the accuracy of the models particularly in arid and semi-arid environments. In this study, we evaluated the Penman-Monteith based MOD16 and the modified Priestley-Taylor (PT-JPL) models at the daily time step against three measured ET datasets. We used data from two summer and one winter rainfall sites in South Africa. One site was dominated by native broad leaf and the other by fine leafed deciduous savanna tree species and C4 grasses. The third site was in the winter rainfall Cape region and had shrubby fynbos vegetation. Actual ET was measured using open-path eddy covariance systems at the summer rainfall sites while a surface energy balance system utilizing the large aperture boundary layer scintillometer was used in the Cape. Model performance varied between sites and between years with the worst estimates (R2<0.50 and RMSE>0.80 mm/d) observed during years with prolonged mid-summer dry spells in the summer rainfall areas. Sensitivity tests on MOD16 showed that the leaf area index, surface conductance and radiation budget parameters had the largest effect on simulated ET. MOD16 ET predictions were improved by: (1) reformulating the emissivity expressions in the net radiation equation; (2) incorporating representative surface conductance values; and (3) including a soil moisture stress function in the transpiration sub-model. Implementing these changes increased the accuracy of MOD16 daily ET predictions at all sites. However, similar adjustments to the PT-JPL model yielded minimal improvements. We conclude that the MOD16 ET model has the potential to accurately predict water use in arid environments provided soil water stress and accurate biome-specific parameters are incorporated. DA - 2019-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - MOD16 ET KW - Drought stress KW - Model validation KW - Penman-Monteith KW - Priestley-Taylor KW - Sensitivity analysis LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2019 SM - 1674-6767 SM - 2194-7783 T1 - Comparison of two remote sensing models for estimating evapotranspiration: algorithm evaluation and application in seasonally arid ecosystems in South Africa TI - Comparison of two remote sensing models for estimating evapotranspiration: algorithm evaluation and application in seasonally arid ecosystems in South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11413 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record