ResearchSpace

Comparison of various CEM methods to predict RCS of lossy dielectrics

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pienaar, Ciara
dc.contributor.author Odendaal, JW
dc.contributor.author Joubert, J
dc.contributor.author Pienaar, M
dc.contributor.author Smit, Johan C
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-12T08:51:03Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-12T08:51:03Z
dc.date.issued 2017-09
dc.identifier.citation Pienaar, C., Odendaal, J.W., Joubert, J., Pienaar, M. & Smit, J.C. 2017. Comparison of various CEM methods to predict RCS of lossy dielectrics. In: 2017 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), 11-15 September 2017, Verona, Italy en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-5090-4452-8
dc.identifier.uri https://goo.gl/daq1QZ
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10962
dc.description 2017 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), 11-15 September 2017, Verona, Italy. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file only contains the abstract of the full-text item. For access to the full-text item, please consult the publisher's website. While waiting for the post-print or published PDF document from the publisher en_US
dc.description.abstract The accuracy with which various full-wave and asymptotic CEM techniques can calculate the RCS of lossy dielectric objects is investigated. This is conducted through comparison to measured RCS data. The investigated methods include MLFMM, FEM, PO and RL-GO. Different lossy dielectric materials are used to construct canonical targets. The RCS of these targets are measured in a compact range at the University of Pretoria, South Africa. The material properties of these lossy dielectrics are accurately characterised using a waveguide technique. Accurate CAD models of the dielectric objects are constructed and used for simulations. The calculated RCS results are compared to the measurements to determine the accuracy of the various methods. The performance and computational efficiency of these methods are also investigated. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IEEE en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Workflow;20355
dc.subject Computational electromagnetic en_US
dc.subject CEM modelling en_US
dc.subject Dielectric scattering en_US
dc.subject Radar Cross Section en_US
dc.subject RCS en_US
dc.subject RCS measurements en_US
dc.title Comparison of various CEM methods to predict RCS of lossy dielectrics en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Pienaar, C., Odendaal, J., Joubert, J., Pienaar, M., & Smit, J. C. (2017). Comparison of various CEM methods to predict RCS of lossy dielectrics. IEEE. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10962 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Pienaar, Ciara, JW Odendaal, J Joubert, M Pienaar, and Johan C Smit. "Comparison of various CEM methods to predict RCS of lossy dielectrics." (2017): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10962 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Pienaar C, Odendaal J, Joubert J, Pienaar M, Smit JC, Comparison of various CEM methods to predict RCS of lossy dielectrics; IEEE; 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10962 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Pienaar, Ciara AU - Odendaal, JW AU - Joubert, J AU - Pienaar, M AU - Smit, Johan C AB - The accuracy with which various full-wave and asymptotic CEM techniques can calculate the RCS of lossy dielectric objects is investigated. This is conducted through comparison to measured RCS data. The investigated methods include MLFMM, FEM, PO and RL-GO. Different lossy dielectric materials are used to construct canonical targets. The RCS of these targets are measured in a compact range at the University of Pretoria, South Africa. The material properties of these lossy dielectrics are accurately characterised using a waveguide technique. Accurate CAD models of the dielectric objects are constructed and used for simulations. The calculated RCS results are compared to the measurements to determine the accuracy of the various methods. The performance and computational efficiency of these methods are also investigated. DA - 2017-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Computational electromagnetic KW - CEM modelling KW - Dielectric scattering KW - Radar Cross Section KW - RCS KW - RCS measurements LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2017 SM - 978-1-5090-4452-8 T1 - Comparison of various CEM methods to predict RCS of lossy dielectrics TI - Comparison of various CEM methods to predict RCS of lossy dielectrics UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10962 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name: Smit_2017_ABSTRACT.pdf
Size: 91.85Kb
Format: PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record