ResearchSpace

A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mamushiane, Lusani
dc.contributor.author Lysko, Albert A
dc.contributor.author Dlamini, Sabelo V
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-07T09:48:04Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-07T09:48:04Z
dc.date.issued 2018-04
dc.identifier.citation Mamushiane, L., Lysko, A.A. and Dlamini, S.V. 2018. A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers. 10th Wireless Days Conference (WD), 3-5 April 2018, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, pp. 54-59 en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-5386-5633-4
dc.identifier.uri https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8361694
dc.identifier.uri DOI: 10.1109/WD.2018.8361694
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10752
dc.description Copyright: 2018 IEEE. Due to copyright restrictions, the attached PDF file contains the accepted version of the published item. For access to the published version, kindly consult the publisher's website: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8361694 en_US
dc.description.abstract Software Defined Networking (SDN) is an architecture that decouples the routing intelligence from the forwarding functions, using an entity called 'controller'. It is paramount that the performance of the controller is thoroughly understood prior to its deployment. However, the rapid introduction of many new controllers in the research community makes it difficult to choose a suitable controller. This paper studies and evaluates the performance of several popular open source controllers such as ONOS, Ryu, Floodlight and OpenDayLight in terms of latency and throughput using an OpenFlow benchmarking tool called Cbench. Additionally, a feature-based comparison of the controllers is presented. These experimental tests provide a decision making guideline when selecting a controller. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IEEE en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;22013
dc.subject Software Defined Networking en_US
dc.subject SDN en_US
dc.subject OpenFlow en_US
dc.subject Controller en_US
dc.subject Ryu en_US
dc.subject Floodlight en_US
dc.subject OpenDayLight en_US
dc.subject ONOS en_US
dc.title A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers en_US
dc.type Conference Presentation en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Mamushiane, L., Lysko, A. A., & Dlamini, S. V. (2018). A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers. IEEE. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10752 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Mamushiane, Lusani, Albert A Lysko, and Sabelo V Dlamini. "A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers." (2018): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10752 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Mamushiane L, Lysko AA, Dlamini SV, A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers; IEEE; 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10752 . en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Conference Presentation AU - Mamushiane, Lusani AU - Lysko, Albert A AU - Dlamini, Sabelo V AB - Software Defined Networking (SDN) is an architecture that decouples the routing intelligence from the forwarding functions, using an entity called 'controller'. It is paramount that the performance of the controller is thoroughly understood prior to its deployment. However, the rapid introduction of many new controllers in the research community makes it difficult to choose a suitable controller. This paper studies and evaluates the performance of several popular open source controllers such as ONOS, Ryu, Floodlight and OpenDayLight in terms of latency and throughput using an OpenFlow benchmarking tool called Cbench. Additionally, a feature-based comparison of the controllers is presented. These experimental tests provide a decision making guideline when selecting a controller. DA - 2018-04 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Software Defined Networking KW - SDN KW - OpenFlow KW - Controller KW - Ryu KW - Floodlight KW - OpenDayLight KW - ONOS LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2018 SM - 978-1-5386-5633-4 T1 - A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers TI - A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10752 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name: Mamushiane_22013_ ...
Size: 723.0Kb
Format: PDF
Description: Conference paper
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record