dc.contributor.author |
Du Plessis, A
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sperling, P
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Beerlink, A
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tshabalala, Lerato C
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hoosain, Shaik E
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mathe, Ntombizodwa R
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Le Roux, SG
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-01-16T11:13:22Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-01-16T11:13:22Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018-09 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Du Plessis, A. et al. 2018. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis. MethodsX, vol. 5: 1102-1110 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2215-0161 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159003/
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2018.09.005
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10600
|
|
dc.description |
Article published in MethodsX, vol. 5: 1102-1110 |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
MicroCT is a well-established technique that is used to analyze the interior of objects non-destructively, and it is especially useful for void or porosity analysis. Besides its widespread use, few standards exist and none for additive manufacturing as yet. This is due to the inherent differences in part design, sizes and geometries, which results in different scan resolutions and qualities. This makes direct comparison between different scans of additively manufactured parts almost impossible. In addition, different image analysis methodologies can produce different results. In this method paper, we present a simplified 10 mm cube-shaped coupon sample as a standard size for detailed analysis of porosity using microCT, and a simplified workflow for obtaining porosity information. The aim is to be able to obtain directly comparable porosity information from different samples from the same AM system and even from different AM systems, and to potentially correlate detailed morphologies of the pores or voids with improper process parameters. The method is applied to two examples of different characteristic types of voids in AM: sub-surface lack of fusion due to improper contour scanning, and tree-like pores growing in the build direction. This standardized method demonstrates the capability for microCT to not only quantify porosity, but also identify void types which can be used to improve AM process optimization. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Worklist;21847 |
|
dc.subject |
Additive manufacturing |
en_US |
dc.subject |
MicroCT |
en_US |
dc.subject |
X-ray |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Tomography |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Non-destructive testing |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Standardization |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Porosity |
en_US |
dc.title |
Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Du Plessis, A., Sperling, P., Beerlink, A., Tshabalala, L. C., Hoosain, S. E., Mathe, N. R., & Le Roux, S. (2018). Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10600 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Du Plessis, A, P Sperling, A Beerlink, Lerato C Tshabalala, Shaik E Hoosain, Ntombizodwa R Mathe, and SG Le Roux "Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis." (2018) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10600 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Du Plessis A, Sperling P, Beerlink A, Tshabalala LC, Hoosain SE, Mathe NR, et al. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis. 2018; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10600. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Article
AU - Du Plessis, A
AU - Sperling, P
AU - Beerlink, A
AU - Tshabalala, Lerato C
AU - Hoosain, Shaik E
AU - Mathe, Ntombizodwa R
AU - Le Roux, SG
AB - MicroCT is a well-established technique that is used to analyze the interior of objects non-destructively, and it is especially useful for void or porosity analysis. Besides its widespread use, few standards exist and none for additive manufacturing as yet. This is due to the inherent differences in part design, sizes and geometries, which results in different scan resolutions and qualities. This makes direct comparison between different scans of additively manufactured parts almost impossible. In addition, different image analysis methodologies can produce different results. In this method paper, we present a simplified 10 mm cube-shaped coupon sample as a standard size for detailed analysis of porosity using microCT, and a simplified workflow for obtaining porosity information. The aim is to be able to obtain directly comparable porosity information from different samples from the same AM system and even from different AM systems, and to potentially correlate detailed morphologies of the pores or voids with improper process parameters. The method is applied to two examples of different characteristic types of voids in AM: sub-surface lack of fusion due to improper contour scanning, and tree-like pores growing in the build direction. This standardized method demonstrates the capability for microCT to not only quantify porosity, but also identify void types which can be used to improve AM process optimization.
DA - 2018-09
DB - ResearchSpace
DP - CSIR
KW - Additive manufacturing
KW - MicroCT
KW - X-ray
KW - Tomography
KW - Non-destructive testing
KW - Standardization
KW - Porosity
LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za
PY - 2018
SM - 2215-0161
T1 - Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis
TI - Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10600
ER -
|
en_ZA |