ResearchSpace

Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Du Plessis, A
dc.contributor.author Sperling, P
dc.contributor.author Beerlink, A
dc.contributor.author Tshabalala, Lerato C
dc.contributor.author Hoosain, Shaik E
dc.contributor.author Mathe, Ntombizodwa R
dc.contributor.author Le Roux, SG
dc.date.accessioned 2019-01-16T11:13:22Z
dc.date.available 2019-01-16T11:13:22Z
dc.date.issued 2018-09
dc.identifier.citation Du Plessis, A. et al. 2018. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis. MethodsX, vol. 5: 1102-1110 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2215-0161
dc.identifier.uri https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159003/
dc.identifier.uri doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2018.09.005
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10600
dc.description Article published in MethodsX, vol. 5: 1102-1110 en_US
dc.description.abstract MicroCT is a well-established technique that is used to analyze the interior of objects non-destructively, and it is especially useful for void or porosity analysis. Besides its widespread use, few standards exist and none for additive manufacturing as yet. This is due to the inherent differences in part design, sizes and geometries, which results in different scan resolutions and qualities. This makes direct comparison between different scans of additively manufactured parts almost impossible. In addition, different image analysis methodologies can produce different results. In this method paper, we present a simplified 10 mm cube-shaped coupon sample as a standard size for detailed analysis of porosity using microCT, and a simplified workflow for obtaining porosity information. The aim is to be able to obtain directly comparable porosity information from different samples from the same AM system and even from different AM systems, and to potentially correlate detailed morphologies of the pores or voids with improper process parameters. The method is applied to two examples of different characteristic types of voids in AM: sub-surface lack of fusion due to improper contour scanning, and tree-like pores growing in the build direction. This standardized method demonstrates the capability for microCT to not only quantify porosity, but also identify void types which can be used to improve AM process optimization. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Worklist;21847
dc.subject Additive manufacturing en_US
dc.subject MicroCT en_US
dc.subject X-ray en_US
dc.subject Tomography en_US
dc.subject Non-destructive testing en_US
dc.subject Standardization en_US
dc.subject Porosity en_US
dc.title Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Du Plessis, A., Sperling, P., Beerlink, A., Tshabalala, L. C., Hoosain, S. E., Mathe, N. R., & Le Roux, S. (2018). Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10600 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Du Plessis, A, P Sperling, A Beerlink, Lerato C Tshabalala, Shaik E Hoosain, Ntombizodwa R Mathe, and SG Le Roux "Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis." (2018) http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10600 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Du Plessis A, Sperling P, Beerlink A, Tshabalala LC, Hoosain SE, Mathe NR, et al. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis. 2018; http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10600. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Article AU - Du Plessis, A AU - Sperling, P AU - Beerlink, A AU - Tshabalala, Lerato C AU - Hoosain, Shaik E AU - Mathe, Ntombizodwa R AU - Le Roux, SG AB - MicroCT is a well-established technique that is used to analyze the interior of objects non-destructively, and it is especially useful for void or porosity analysis. Besides its widespread use, few standards exist and none for additive manufacturing as yet. This is due to the inherent differences in part design, sizes and geometries, which results in different scan resolutions and qualities. This makes direct comparison between different scans of additively manufactured parts almost impossible. In addition, different image analysis methodologies can produce different results. In this method paper, we present a simplified 10 mm cube-shaped coupon sample as a standard size for detailed analysis of porosity using microCT, and a simplified workflow for obtaining porosity information. The aim is to be able to obtain directly comparable porosity information from different samples from the same AM system and even from different AM systems, and to potentially correlate detailed morphologies of the pores or voids with improper process parameters. The method is applied to two examples of different characteristic types of voids in AM: sub-surface lack of fusion due to improper contour scanning, and tree-like pores growing in the build direction. This standardized method demonstrates the capability for microCT to not only quantify porosity, but also identify void types which can be used to improve AM process optimization. DA - 2018-09 DB - ResearchSpace DP - CSIR KW - Additive manufacturing KW - MicroCT KW - X-ray KW - Tomography KW - Non-destructive testing KW - Standardization KW - Porosity LK - https://researchspace.csir.co.za PY - 2018 SM - 2215-0161 T1 - Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis TI - Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10600 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record