Unary self-verifying symmetric difference automata were introduced in [1], with an upper bound of O(2(supn) ) and lower bound of 2(sup n-1) -1 for state complexity. Implicit in the interpretation of self-verifying acceptance for the symmetric difference case was the assumption that no state could be both an accept state and a reject state. We present another interpretation of acceptance more aligned to the equivalence of symmetric difference automata to weighted automata over GF(2), where states that both accept and reject are allowed, and we give a tight bound of 2(sup n-1) -1 for state complexity for both interpretations of acceptance.
Reference:
Marais, L. and Van Zijl, L. 2017. State complexity of unary SV-XNFA with different acceptance conditions. Proceedings of the 19th IFIP WG 1.02 International Conference on Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems (DCFS) 2017, 3-5 July 2017, Milano, Italy, pp. 250-261
Marais, L., & Van Zijl, L. (2017). State complexity of unary SV-XNFA with different acceptance conditions. Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10297
Marais, Laurette, and Lynette Van Zijl. "State complexity of unary SV-XNFA with different acceptance conditions." (2017): http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10297
Marais L, Van Zijl L, State complexity of unary SV-XNFA with different acceptance conditions; Springer; 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/10297 .